- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 8,003
- Liked Posts:
- 1,105
- Location:
- Behind you
To think that after the Cubs tried getting Roberts but wouldn't give up Felix Pie and Rich Hill. Now they may get him by giving up Zambrano and his horrible contract
To think that after the Cubs tried getting Roberts but wouldn't give up Felix Pie and Rich Hill. Now they may get him by giving up Zambrano and his horrible contract
Figgins can play some outfield. He actually could be useful as a supersub type.
Assuming he's capable of regressing to pre-Seattle Figgins :lol:
dont we have that "supersub" in dewitt?
Wow, does CO honestly think Ricketts is doing better than Mark Cuban could have
Cuban took the laughing stock Mavericks to an NBA title in a decade. Should have had 2, but he made the Mavericks relevant, not only with his antics, which the Cubs could use, and the money he spent.
But that's the thing, Cuban got people and began turning the Mavs around right away. He had Dirk, and began to build around him, turned the Mavs into a Western Conference playoff team right away.I am not going to say who would be better because its not even possible to validate either claim, but the bold is what I am interested in.
It took him a DECADE. Not only that but the Mavs were on the way up the year that he bought them (20-12) and had one of the best players in the league.
The Cubs were on the way down and have no player that could be considered a best player and not only that but in baseball one player is not nearly as valuable as in basketball.
One player can take you from being awful to being in the NBA Finals (see Cleveland).
Regardless you pointed out a decade for Cuban. Ricketts has been owner for just over 13 months.
Let's give him some time before pulling out the jump to conclusions mat.
Not really when Cuban and Ricketts were the two main bidders for the Cubs. I wouldn't compare the two if Cuban didn't want the Cubs.Not directed to anyone in particular.
I don't think its fair to judge Ricketts yet. Its been what? Two years?
And comparing Ricketts to Cuban is apples to oranges as poodski said "One player can take you from being awful to being in the NBA Finals (see Cleveland)". Its much easier, in theory, to build a good-enough basketball team than a baseball team. For example: 2010-11 New York Knicks.
Nothing wrong with evaluating him, but to say Ricketts suck with only two years is kind of lame. I'm going to give him 5 years before I think he's good or bad.
But that's the thing, Cuban got people and began turning the Mavs around right away. He had Dirk, and began to build around him, turned the Mavs into a Western Conference playoff team right away.
Ricketts has been here 2 years now. I haven't saw him make changes or spend big at the MLB level. I'm beginning to believe Ricketts doesn't have the resources to compete at the MLB level.
To be fair, that team was more John Henry's team than his.I didn't see Jeff Loria as a man to lead a team to a World Series either. If the guy picks the right people to manage the resources he is currently devoting, this is an organization that can contending in the not too distant future.
I said they were both young stars :shrug: That would be true, Dirk made the all-star team in his 4th NBA season. Castro I guess in his 2nd MLB season, 4th professional.Also Fisch Castro is no where in the same league as Dirk.
I blame the Cubs for paying Zambrano. I always liked and always will like Zambrano.
Yeah Zambrano punched out Michael Barrett.What were they supposed to do? Let him go? If Hendry had let him go, the bitching about Z would be about triple.