CCS: lebron is the best at everything

[zack54attack]

I want to say I think he means LeBron's antics maybe? Some people cite those as childish.

I'll agree his antics are childish. But if I was making that money, I wouldnt give a **** lol

 

[houheffna]

I think so, your point?

So Lebron needs 3 rings to be in the discussion with Oscar and his one ring...I just think that is a bit unfair. You don't?

I said the same thing about comparing Kobe to Jordan...ability and rings are different in my opinion.

 

[Glide2keva]

So Lebron needs 3 rings to be in the discussion with Oscar and his one ring...I just think that is a bit unfair. You don't?

Okay, I will give you Oscar. But everyone else is fair.

I said the same thing about comparing Kobe to Jordan...ability and rings are different in my opinion.

Kobe has 5 rings, but he isn't in Jordan's league. IMO.

 

[zack54attack]

WITNESS HOW MANY RINGS HE'S GOT!

Worst Argument Ever.

 

[houheffna]

Okay, I will give you Oscar. But everyone else is fair.

Kobe has 5 rings, but he isn't in Jordan's league. IMO.

And what exactly do you base that on?

 

[thechosenone]

The King Kong is the best player in the league right now.

I would choose Howard over him easily if you ask me to pick one because I BELIEVE (thats my personal opinion yes. No need to argue there.) that having a beast under the basket has a bigger impact on your team than having LeBron. I also believe that the Heat without Bron would be a playoff team but the Magic without Dwight wouldn't. He was never one of my favorite players and I am glad he didn't come to the Bulls.I would choose Durant over him too but thats because I like players with a killer instict like Jordan and Kobe and I believe that Durant is the next big one.But the fact is that LeBron is the best right now.

Lebron is not perfect at everything in the game. There are many things in the game that he is very good at,many things he is good at,and many things that he is bad at. But in the end of the day noone else is good at so many things in the game and thats why he is the best right now.

Anyone who admires him so much can close his eyes to all the things he is not good at but deep inside he knows that he is fooling himself. When he asks himself that simple question: "If I am in the 7th game of the finals and my team is losing 115-114 in the 3rd overtime with 10 seconds left,in whose hands i prefer the ball to be?" He knows that the hard to admit answer won't be Lebron.

 

[B18]

Lebron has the self esteem of an obese 13 year old girl.

 

[Deng Defense Force]

I think we can all agree that Lebron is the victim here and shouldn't ever be blamed for his own words or actions.

"I'm an easy target; if someone wants to get a point across -- just throw LeBron's name in there," James said. "You could be watching cartoons with your kids and you don't like it, you say, 'Blame it on LeBron.' If you go to the grocery store and they don't have the milk that you like, you just say, 'It's LeBron's fault.' " - LeBron James

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFh5FzXIeBg&feature=related]You wanna hurt me? - YouTube[/ame]

^^^Am I the only one that immediately thought of this when I read/heard LeBrons quote today?^^^

 

[Axl Rose]

bron is a beast

but imma still clown on him cuz its the thing to do :lol:

 

[Glide2keva]

And what exactly do you base that on?

Having watched both of them play. Jordan was way more fundamentally sound. He was quicker, faster, had a basketball IQ through the roof, and was just an overall better player on both ends of the court. Kobe was never known as a great defender. A good defender, yes, but great, no. Jordan was one of the best perimeter defenders in league history.

He's top 5 all time is scoring and steals, actually Top 3 all time, and that;s having taken two breaks in his career.

Kobe was just never a smart basketball player. He never bothered to find that balance of getting his teammates involved and dominating the game when needed. Jordan did., and that's what makes him in a whole different class than Kobe. Never mind the fact that his FG% for someone who took as many shots as he has is able to be rounded to 50%. For a 2 guard, that's insane!

Kobe has no shot at getting there, because he never met a a bad shot he did like. Did Jordan take some bad shots? Sure. He did take a lot of good shots, hence the high FG%, and that's also with his 3-point% bringing it down, and his Wizards years (which weren't as bad as people make them out to be, given his age and time off).

Jordan was a better attacker of the basket, mid-range shooter, on ball defender, help defender, open court defender, finisher around the rim, shot blocker, passing lane player, I can go on and on.

Kobe is not in Jordan's league. Period. You watched them both, so you know of what I speak. I've watched Jordan since UNC, before I knew he would be a Bull. I watched him in the 84 Olympics in LA, so I've seen enough of him to give that assessment.

 

[FirstTimer]

Larry Bird approves of this thread.

 

[Axl Rose]

yall actin like yall didnt want bron

and if you didnt you most certainly would want him over boozer

 

[Glide2keva]

yall actin like yall didnt want bron

and if you didnt you most certainly would want him over boozer

I didn't. I wanted Wade & Bosh because they filled the Bulls' most pressing needs at the time. SG & PF. We had Deng at the 3 so I was good with him being there.

Don't lump us all in one category.

 

[Dementia]

I didn't. I wanted Wade & Bosh because they filled the Bulls' most pressing needs at the time. SG & PF. We had Deng at the 3 so I was good with him being there.

Don't lump us all in one category.

I'm pretty sure the best player in the league is a "need" no matter who you have playing in that position.

 

[FirstTimer]

Welp.

I'm hard.

 

[BNB]

yall actin like yall didnt want bron

and if you didnt you most certainly would want him over boozer

we got the better #6 last year anyway.

 

[Glide2keva]

I'm pretty sure the best player in the league is a "need" no matter who you have playing in that position.

If you're set at a certain position, it becomes a luxury, more so than a need.

We had NO ONE at the SG & PF spots, so those were NEEDS that needed to filled.

 

[FirstTimer]

Yeah because if we signed Lebron it'snot like we couldn't have traded Deng for SG or PF help or anything.

LOL at Glide but a simple minded bafoon.

 

[Scoot26]

If you're set at a certain position, it becomes a luxury, more so than a need.

We had NO ONE at the SG & PF spots, so those were NEEDS that needed to filled.

We could have and probably still would have signed Boozer. We had room for two max contracts. We wouldn't have had the bench filled out the way we did, but I doubt that matters much with LeBron James on the team.

Deng could have been moved, though at that point if would have been harder because at that point he was still considered vastly overpaid for what he was. Now teams would be more inclined to take him, but I also feel the Bulls would have found a way to acquire a SG for Deng if need be.

 

[ChiTeez.com]

I was all for LeBron coming to Chicago. Why not, he is a DAMN good player, once of the best, if not the best in the NBA. He can do it all, score, pass, defend, who wouldn't want him? I question his ability to finish games, but he would have helped this team.