DMelt36
Bolland > You
- Joined:
- May 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,969
- Liked Posts:
- 8,434
Would you consider moving him in the off-season?
No fucking way you trade Bolland. Why trade a center on a team that already has so few?
Would you consider moving him in the off-season?
No fucking way you trade Bolland. Why trade a center on a team that already has so few?
campbells contract sucked, but he sure would look good back here. I knew he would be missed by us hawks fans, I knew we wouldnt miss his salary....but we need to use what we have available and start piecing this shit pile back together.
The only current issue I have with the Campbell trade is that the Blackhawks aren't using the cap space that Campbell held.
I would do that trade 100 times over...because it makes sense. What doesn't make sense is to pay your #3 dman over $7mil in the cap era.
Would you consider moving him in the off-season?
NO
We don't have many centers.
if Soupy was making 2 mil less, he'd still be here.
We had cap space from the deal & piss it away.
Slapnuts Ek says today: Rumor Nash to Kings..."Looks done"
Meanwhile...
Jaeckel says today: Got a late tip just after posting this from a top source: the Hawks are in on the Nash bidding; they are putting together a substantial offer for Blue Jacket management that I am told does not include Patrick Kane. Clearly, due to Nash's salary, it would have to include other core or near core player(s). More as I hear it.
Jaeckel isn't the rumor whore that Ek is (nobody is) and tends to give vague rumors regarding potential teams rather than concrete player names so this strikes me as interesting.
Slapnuts Ek says today: Rumor Nash to Kings..."Looks done"
Meanwhile...
Jaeckel says today: Got a late tip just after posting this from a top source: the Hawks are in on the Nash bidding; they are putting together a substantial offer for Blue Jacket management that I am told does not include Patrick Kane. Clearly, due to Nash's salary, it would have to include other core or near core player(s). More as I hear it.
Jaeckel isn't the rumor whore that Ek is (nobody is) and tends to give vague rumors regarding potential teams rather than concrete player names so this strikes me as interesting.
I would think that it would take something like...Sharp + Leddy + prospects. Or Bolland + Leddy + high end prospects. Stalberg? Frolik would have to go for cap purposes (maybe even Olesz). Possibly Montador for cap purposes.
Geez, I can't even think what it would take to get Nash.
Do remember, he has a cap hit of $7.8Mil (yes...even more than Campbell had)
I would think that it would take something like...Sharp + Leddy + prospects. Or Bolland + Leddy + high end prospects. Stalberg? Frolik would have to go for cap purposes (maybe even Olesz). Possibly Montador for cap purposes.
Geez, I can't even think what it would take to get Nash.
Do remember, he has a cap hit of $7.8Mil (yes...even more than Campbell had)
I'd love Rick Nash if we didn't spend a fucking 12 yr deal on Hossa.
No way Bolland is enough.
Sharp has to be the big name. Leddy and Stalberg would be very enticing... more so than prospects.
We can all argue all we want about Stalberg (please don't here), but he could be very valuable in any kind of deal.
edit: dew hit the stalberg nail on the head just before me.