- Joined:
- May 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 47,862
- Liked Posts:
- 26,359
Who the hell is Judd?
I'm still trying to figure out what indifferential is.Who the hell is Judd?
Come on now. Big thumbs and autocorrect issues.I'm still trying to figure out what indifferential is.
Cards will land one of the Japanese lefties.Wouldn't be shocking to see the 2 Japanese lefties at min added. I think Assad stabilizes the middle innings which are a big deal in the current 5 inning starter. Adding a lefty to balance the pen.makes sense then.
I guess this site put up a Morel to 1B article. Didn't read it. Not mad at the idea. I do feel that Jed should trade him while his value is still good. The holes in his game are going to be a long term issue and better to get a established player in return
Can't remember who replied about Chapman's slump.
Players slump. Who cares. You are paying for 162 games. That includes defense and the good and bad days at the dish.
If it saves a few mil because he was not awesome sauce all year long. Cool
For me I value the glove over the bat at 3B. Jed must have agreed as Morel did not play there and a more stable no power stick Madgral did. When he was off the DL
So take it for what it is worth. If Jed really felt the bat was #1 then Candy would have been at 3B full time vs at 1B the majority.
It is a reason why I see Candy not viewed as a 3B solution in FA for Jed. A swing guy and DH I can see. Full time nope.
Cards will land one of the Japanese lefties.
The indifferential went out on my Buick last weekI'm still trying to figure out what indifferential is.
That it will be.Who knows. It should be an interesting free agency
WrongAfter reading what Judd said about everything. He did bring up a couple key points. Last year they were the only team that Did not make the playoffs with a positive run indifferential.
So if you felt that runs were left on the table.
He also said that councle has over performed year and in year out any cited 2017 has that team he ran had no business being there and push the Cubs to the last week.
So let's take out of this? I'm not sure honestly I think from what he said that a big signing is not necessarily going to happen. And the signing and how he mentioned performing above your expectations as this was an issue going into this year. If I had to guess they're still going to stick with the farm they want a guy that can get the maximum output from the players and that's a big reason why they made this decision
But what about their indifferential? Did they speak with the council about it?Wrong
I didn’t look up how many other teams missed the playoffs with a positive run DIFFERENTIAL. But, I know the Padres missed the playoffs with a positive run differential also
Let me hop in my time traveling machine to the 1500’s and I’ll let you know what the Council of Trent has to say about it!!But what about their indifferential? Did they speak with the council about it?
Update on indifferential:indifferential
noun
- A thing which may be done or not done, indifferently; a non-essential.
It's an actual word
nobody was concerned as to whether or not it is an actual word. The issue is that "run indifferential" is not a thing in baseball.Update on indifferential:
According to the 1960s multi volume Funk and Wagnells dictionary in this old house..
indifferential is not a word
Though for your edification
indifferency
indifferentism
and indifferentist are word
4. If the Cubs had made the playoffs, would Hoyer still have made this move?Wrong
I didn’t look up how many other teams missed the playoffs with a positive run DIFFERENTIAL. But, I know the Padres missed the playoffs with a positive run differential also
Edit - Seattle also missed the playoffs with a positive run differential
He wasn't off on that point because that quote you just shared and what you previously said are not the same thingOh well Jed was off on that. But he makes a point