CSF77
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 18,639
- Liked Posts:
- 2,843
- Location:
- San Diego
Hope so shoot makes a solid off-season and opens up a Madgril tradeREPORT: Dansby Swanson Has Offers in Hand and the Cubs Do Kinda Sound Like the Favorites
Cubs have put an offer in Swanson hands supposedly and would be the favorites as of right now.
I gotta say I’ve really warmed up to your idea of Dansby if the years on the contract aren’t crazyI will just say this.
Swanson makes up the middle 3 gold glove quality players. The fWAR on the D side alone should keep the Cubs in games.
What happens down the road really doesn't matter much. Prospects bust or move positions to get in. 2 years ago we were looking at Davis as a CF lock. Now a after thought to PCA.
So Jed should keep it gearing up for 2023. If pushing a GG quality backbone is what gets you wins then do it and not worry about 2024+
I'd like justin turner on a short contract at 3rd. I'd keep Madrigal and have him DH and give hoerner and swanson rest occasionallyYou know, if people are looking to move up to .500 while you wait for the kids....it wouldn't take breaking the bank on the big names floating around out there to get in done. If they sign Swanson to something a little more in line to what he would give them....then you take a flyer out on Drury for third and JD Martinez to DH. Maybe grab young catcher like Felciano, who was highly rated at some point and is only 24. It wouldn't take much to fill the bullpen hole the way Ross handles them.
I still think Swanson is a level below the other guys but if he's willing to acknowledge that....the up the middle D would be greatly improved with Bellinger/Swanson/Hoerner which would also improve the pitching. BTW, I just read that Swanson's wife is a soccer player on the Chicago Red Stars...that might be a factor as well in the signing process.
Also, I would not move Madrigal....first given his injury history, they wouldn't get squat for him. Also Hoerner misses quite a bit of time
as well. Keep them both and maybe you get a full season of them if they play less.
I thought Dodgers gave him a 1 year deal...I thought I saw that.I'd like justin turner on a short contract at 3rd. I'd keep Madrigal and have him DH and give hoerner and swanson rest occasionally
His option was declined and is currently a FA. I'd love to have him for a year or 2.I thought Dodgers gave him a 1 year deal...I thought I saw that.
He's still probably still a better hitter than Drury but, damn....he's older than dirt for a baseball player. At his age, he would come cheap though.His option was declined and is currently a FA. I'd love to have him for a year or 2.
Others I'd be interested in bringing in to DH/1b are conforto, carpenter and martinez like you mentioned. All would be short term options
Team has upticked after the GM hire. Jed just needs to do one thing. Pay for talent.- Yahoo Sports
sports.yahoo.com
He's still probably still a better hitter than Drury but, damn....he's older than dirt for a baseball player. At his age, he would come cheap though.
I like Martinez as RH to Mervis LH at 1B....plus while it looks real promising, you still don't know if Mervis is the real deal or not. If he is the real deal, you can have Martinez DH.
This is the big spending Ricketts and Kenney were talking about!Cubs agree to a one year $2.8M deal with Brad Boxberger.
The signing we've all been waiting for
I mean look i get why people would be skeptical but I think he has talent. I think the issue is the guy was coming off a long injury and didn't have a normal spring training. Now i'm not saying he's destined to be a star but i think he can be a starting caliber player on a decent team. He's only had 552 PAs and he's still got a 95 wRC+ and 1.8 fWAR for roughly a season of work. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect some growth out of a 26 year old who'd not even had more than 600 PAs. Let's say conservatively he gets to 100 or 105 wRC+ in his prime years... that's not a terrible hitter. And keep in mind cubs in any scenario aren't really ready to win a world series in the next year and probably not the year following. So if he can buy you a few years cheaply until the more highly touted prospects arrive I don't really see an issue. And best case he taps into his top 5 pick potential.But Madrigal?
I mean look i get why people would be skeptical but I think he has talent. I think the issue is the guy was coming off a long injury and didn't have a normal spring training. Now i'm not saying he's destined to be a star but i think he can be a starting caliber player on a decent team. He's only had 552 PAs and he's still got a 95 wRC+ and 1.8 fWAR for roughly a season of work. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect some growth out of a 26 year old who'd not even had more than 600 PAs. Let's say conservatively he gets to 100 or 105 wRC+ in his prime years... that's not a terrible hitter. And keep in mind cubs in any scenario aren't really ready to win a world series in the next year and probably not the year following. So if he can buy you a few years cheaply until the more highly touted prospects arrive I don't really see an issue. And best case he taps into his top 5 pick potential.
I like him too. But the fact that he's only played 142 total games in three MLB seasons is a killer. Hurts the team in multiple ways....mostly because it slows his development and lowers his value.I mean look i get why people would be skeptical but I think he has talent. I think the issue is the guy was coming off a long injury and didn't have a normal spring training. Now i'm not saying he's destined to be a star but i think he can be a starting caliber player on a decent team. He's only had 552 PAs and he's still got a 95 wRC+ and 1.8 fWAR for roughly a season of work. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect some growth out of a 26 year old who'd not even had more than 600 PAs. Let's say conservatively he gets to 100 or 105 wRC+ in his prime years... that's not a terrible hitter. And keep in mind cubs in any scenario aren't really ready to win a world series in the next year and probably not the year following. So if he can buy you a few years cheaply until the more highly touted prospects arrive I don't really see an issue. And best case he taps into his top 5 pick potential.