brett05
867-5309
- Joined:
- Apr 28, 2009
- Posts:
- 27,226
- Liked Posts:
- 4,579
- Location:
- Hell
He may be more comfortable fitting into the Twin Cities’ noted Japanese community.
Couid be. Fun to wait. Will be a nice coop for the winning team.
He may be more comfortable fitting into the Twin Cities’ noted Japanese community.
So I'm curious what others feel happens after the cubs sign Darvish. I think it's fair to say that if the cubs want Darvish there's a pretty good shot they are going to get him. I don't see anyone out there that's really in a position to out bid them and he doesn't seem dead set on location. Realistically i can't see Darvish getting much more than $25 mil AAV and I've already laid out the case why he may get less. But for the sake of argument let's assume he gets $25 mil aav. The cubs would be some where around $180 mil. Probably can't do Davis at that point and stay under the luxury tax.
I think at that point you'd likely look to nail down a few low key trades. Something I was thinking about is Zobrist. I feel like if you could move him you may have the money to sign Davis. Zobrist is owed $16.5 mil next year. It's not absurd for the performance he likely can give you as a starter but given the role he's likely to play he's pretty over priced. The mets are a team that comes to mind as a team looking at 2B trades and a team that was connected on Zobrist when the cubs signed him. I don't know if something like Matt Harvey for Zobrist makes much sense. It would be nice to have someone behind Chatwood. And theoretically you could use the idea of a 6 man rotation with Monty and Harvey in the "bullpen." Think Harvey is supposed to make around $6 mil in the last year of arb. So you'd be saving around $10 mil that you could theoretically push toward davis. My only issue with trading Zobrist is he's a big character guy who Maddon loves and it would screw up your lead off situation even more. So, I'm kind of two minds about this idea.
Cubs also still need a back up catcher though you can likely find someone for $2-4 mil. If they don't end up with Davis you could also look to free some playing time via a trade.
I'm not as confident in signing Darvish as you are and I also think that if they want the 4 year deal the AAV is going to be closer to $30 mil. Maybe if they signed him for 6 years you could get to $25-$27 mil AAV but it seems like years are the most important factor. Where I agree though that you can't sign Darvish and Davis if you plan on playing in t he mega-class of FA next year. As far as Zobrist he has a full no trade through this year and he was bad last year. I don't know why the Mets would be interested when there are so many 2B options, some better and cheaper.
Couldn't remember if Zobrist had a NTC or not. As for darvish getting $30 mil I'd be shocked. The difference between him and Price is there were a ton of suitors for Price. And frankly I'm not sure any player is going to take 4 years at his age. It just doesn't set up well for him. I'm certain you'd take $22-24 mil AAV over 6 years rather than say $27 over 4 because on the worst case you're guaranteeing yourself $24 mil more even if theoretically you could get more at age 35 with a new team.
Regardless, I just don't see how the market is going to be that hot for him. As far as I know the only teams even being talked about in connection with him right now are minny and the cubs and minny isn't historically a team who spends for tier 1 FA. The fact they are involved strikes me more as a case of them seeing him as being a discount "ace" they can afford rather than someone they are going to throw $30 mil AAV at.
Philly is involved as well but seem to be waiting on Arrieta who they supposedly prefer. I mention the years because Darvish is looking for 5-6 years and the Cubs are supposedly offering 4. Maybe they settle on 5 but I can't see how 5/$125 gets that done. I hope I'm wrong.
Also for what it's worth, given where the cubs sit at luxury tax wise it is probably better for them to do a 6-7 year deal rather than a 4 year deal because the way they calculate luxury tax it's based on the AAV. For example, if you assume the cubs are fine with 4/$120, they'd be better off doing a few more years at relatively less money to spread out the pain of the luxury tax. From their perspective if you're fine with 4/$120 then you're getting 2 years at $20 mil for 6/$140 and instead of $30 mil AAV for luxury tax that's down to $23.3 mil AAV.
I think the plan is to go over teh tax next year, so I don't know how much a concern it is. They seem to be focused on fewer years.
I think their set on Caratini as back up catcher..
They got Avila and Rivera because Willson got hurt and outside of Caratini they had noone else ..Don't think I agree with this. Firstly if they were going to do this why deal for avila and pick up rivera? Secondly you want depth at C because it's hard to find guys. In my eyes you want to pair Contreras with an aging vet a la ross who can't play every day but who offers you help with handling a staff. That then allows Caratini to be their third string guy in AAA or if they go nuts with 3 C you have him on the roster.
On Darvish and what he might be offered and all..
I agree with above about it being the years and not so much money...
Arrieta all about him wanting 6-7 yrs. at 25 to 30 per.
Epstein not going near that
Cobb may be looking at 5-6 yrs 20-25 per.. Epstein probably wants 3 or 4 with him tops..
Epstein not going more then 5 on a Pitcher and probably figured he has a shot at nabbing Darvish at 4 or 5 yrs at close to 25 .
Theo probably figured why not try for the better starter at 4 or 5 , eventhough he a year older then cobb, offer a little more money but get less years..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
They got Avila and Rivera because Willson got hurt and outside of Caratini they had noone else ..
Id love for them to bring Avila back, surprise they havent yet...
Guessing he waiting on a chance to start or something somewhere..
Just thinking their putting most of their money into pitching and may look inside to fill out the backup roles..
Pretty much staying as is with the position players
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk