brett05
867-5309
- Joined:
- Apr 28, 2009
- Posts:
- 27,226
- Liked Posts:
- 4,579
- Location:
- Hell
President Clinton might have killed him if he wasn't so busy killing babies
I don't think Bush43 handled the recourse well. His #1 mistake, not establishing a positive diplomatic relationship with our allies in the region. Instead he labeled so many middle-easterners as terrorists prematurely based on the interests of those plutocrats who got him elected into the office. Otherwise we could have just listened to our own intel and nabbed Bin Laden in 2003-2004 and 2006+, when we knew exactly where he was hiding!
President Clinton might have killed him if he wasn't so busy killing babies
I'm sorry pot, I'm a truffle deaf in this ear, speak a little louder next time
Die hard liberal eh?
Nope. Just not a blow-hard like you.
From what I have read, and understand of Rami, I would put him somewhere as a left leaning centrist. But of course, as time changes, so do people. And, yes, dabynksy, labels, labels! If only if they were used correctly! LMAO!
You ascribe thoughts to me that were not present, but if I am affecting your thought in anyway I guess I will take that as a positive. Also wine is awesome.
LOL, I just knew you would be the first to notice my little slip of hypocrisy.
Am I really that quick to jump on people?
Not really
Damn, that was a quick response.
Crystallas' tongue slips whenever he speaks.LOL, I just knew you would be the first to notice my little slip of hypocrisy.
Nope. Just not a blow-hard like you.
Does this really help advance the discourse in this thread in any way?
Yes in the discussion of politics it certainly does, but after re-reading the initial post I think anything political would be appropriate.
The banks were told by the Clinton Administration to make the deals that led us spiraling economically
On phone. Sorry. But when the banks started to fail it was all over the news. I heard it explained In depth on the McLaughlin report