Way back in post #60, I said this:
If you look at the best teams in the NFC, you'll note something they have in common:
Russell Wilson
Drew Brees
Tom Brady
Aaron Rodgers
Kyler Murray
etc.
The Bears have Nick Foles.
He does not belong in that group.
So here we are.
In subsequent posts I stated that the talent gap between Foles and these QBs was immense, and as a result it makes it very difficult to compete with those teams. QB being by far the most important position on the team, that puts the Bears at an incredible disadvantage,
I stand by that.
If your point is that Foles is better than Trubisky, I agree with that.
So what? That just highlights what a bust Trubisky is.
Foles would be a back-up on any team with a good quarterback. The Bears don't have one, so he gets to start.
And the Bears, with one of the very best defenses in the NFL, get to be 5-3 and likely not going anywhere significant. Teams with lesser defenses but a superior QB will likely fare better.
That is all.