Les Grossman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jun 22, 2011
- Posts:
- 14,049
- Liked Posts:
- 12,103
LMAOOOOOOO this is low key one of the who’s FA signings in history. Up there with Haynesworth hahax.com
x.com
LMAOOOOOOO this is low key one of the who’s FA signings in history. Up there with Haynesworth hahax.com
x.com
Crazy because a couple of years ago remember being called an idiot about this!So Pete Carroll & the Seahawks won the Russell Wilson divorce huh?
Jesus that’s a crazy amount of dead money. Is Elway still running the show in Denver??
OK that makes a lot more sense the Broncos subreddit said it was $17M but no way does he get more than 39.
Hes signing for vet min. There is no benefit not to and he looks more attractive to teams that way
Crazy because a couple of years ago remember being called an idiot about this!
I actually wouldn't mind that either if he comes with a reasonable deal.I like the idea of signing Barkley. Neither Herbert or Johnson are complete backs. Saquon is.
He's still young. Sign him to a 3 year deal with an out after two while you look for his replacement in the next two drafts.
For how much? He ran for less than 1k yards last year (14 games) and only averaged 3.9 Y/A. I don’t think he’s the same ol Barkley and I’ve never been a fan of signing RBs for a lot of moneyI like the idea of signing Barkley. Neither Herbert or Johnson are complete backs. Saquon is.
He's still young. Sign him to a 3 year deal with an out after two while you look for his replacement in the next two drafts.
If the Broncos are willing to take 85 million dollars in dead money by releasing him, there’s more to it. If I was other teams, I’d be asking why?
Hes signing for vet min. There is no benefit not to and he looks more attractive to teams that way
If the Broncos are willing to take 85 million dollars in dead money by releasing him, there’s more to it. If I was other teams, I’d be asking why?
Pretty sure they gave up two firsts also.LMAOOOOOOO this is low key one of the who’s FA signings in history. Up there with Haynesworth haha
OH I got you, I just wanted to share in this happy vision I have going in my head.I am a big Jenkins fan and also would of loved it if him and Wright could of lined up together on the right side but once again Poles/Flus moved Jenkins, again, because they signed a G in N.Davis who only can/wants to play at RG.
I imagined it that's why my second sentence was this:
Not to say i wouldn't thoroughly enjoy watching Henry running through the lines like the beast he is and completely mushing a defender or two with a Henry stiff arm because i would.
It was a trade and an extension which makes it much worse.LMAOOOOOOO this is low key one of the who’s FA signings in history. Up there with Haynesworth haha
Here’s a recap of the whole deal.Pretty sure they gave up two firsts also.
The Giants had no pass threat on offense and their OL was terrible. Barkley got all of defenses attention with loaded boxes. With a respectable pass game and better OL (that we have) I bet he sees a career resurgence.For how much? He ran for less than 1k yards last year (14 games) and only averaged 3.9 Y/A. I don’t think he’s the same ol Barkley and I’ve never been a fan of signing RBs for a lot of money
I am fine with that except that Caleb will beat out Wilson in training camp. They aren’t drafting CW #1 and having him sit one let alone two years. Maybe, maybe, RW or other vet starts a few games. Maybe you sign him to mentor and in case of injury. But if CW isn’t ready the first year they probably screwed up. Further how much is Wilson going to cost to be, at best, a place holder? I am not dismissing this completely, it isn’t a terrible idea, but money will probably be better spent elsewhere. If CW is truly “generational” does he need his hand held for a year or two?Poles should sign Russell Wilson and have Caleb sit a year or two..
Hate all you want but that would be the perfect scenario..