It just boggles my fucking mind how much he consistently gets wrong. Virtually every post he makes whiffs on some major plot point or another. We're all aware his brain is a mush of shitjelly to begin with, but I don't get what the point of continuously posting about something he can't follow is.
I mean, how would this show make any sense at all if: it was Jamie at the Tower of Joy, a Stark wasn't Jon's mother (thus Robert's Rebellion wouldn't have happened to begin with [setting this entire series of events into action]), the "White Walker story line has never been explained..." (I mean, seriously, just from the show you know that they were created by The Children to fight The First Men, were turned back, the wall was built by Bran the Builder to keep them at bay, The Night's Watch was founded to stop them from returning, they've slept under the ice waiting for a long winter, and so on), apparently the Blackfish was the rightful ruler of Riverrun and at the Red Wedding prior to magically escaping, Tyrion was at the siege while simultaneously wandering around Essos, none of the background of the Tullys took place (Hoster dying, Edmure succeeding him, etc.), Tyrion promised Bronn a new castle/wench prior to making a foray into Dorne...am I missing anything?
I am truly confused as fuck by The Cawk's version of what has been going on in this show. Could someone explain it to me?