- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 47,105
- Liked Posts:
- 36,405
My favorite teams
What did the Hound mean by his words about what was coming the Mountain's way do you think?
Probably that Bronn is going to steal Tyenne away from him.
What did the Hound mean by his words about what was coming the Mountain's way do you think?
Haha. I was going to say the same when Ares first mentioned what an Ogre he looked like. I was expecting someone more mighty and regal looking myself. He was the crown prince after all.
It was posted on a reddit site that they had been casting for a young woman and a young man. Looks like it was for what everyone assumed it to be. Not the same person though. Of course he would look like his family... they're mostly interbred.Look lie the same actor who played Dany's brother.
So now Jamie knows what Cersei's and Euron's plan is for raising another army, one we haven't seen yet so he will be a key to deal with that army next season.
But I have always gotten the impression the past was all just a library he could access, and not that he possessed all that knowledge in his own brain. That is kinda the way the Weirwood net works, isn't it?
He did which confused me. He never has visions of the future that I have seen or he has stated facts from. Only the past. Maybe he has not developed this skill yet? I don't know... seems off to me.Did he say he can see future? If so I totally missed that
So now Jamie knows what Cersei's and Euron's plan is for raising another army, one we haven't seen yet so he will be a key to deal with that army next season.
But Bran himself says outright he can see all past, present, and future.
I agree it would make sense if he has access but needs to uncover the vision in the "archives".... but IMO the writers haven't made that explicit.
He knows things in the show that they don't show him have visions for, so we are left to assume he had a vision of it.
All they need to do in a scene is have someone question how it works and he explains in like 20 seconds "I have access to everything, but in order to recall it I need to find and experience the vision of the event"
Bang, right there the precedent is set in stone and anything he says without a vision scene you can assume he saw a vision of it.
Maybe others feel they have already established this, I would say they want me to assume it, and 20 seconds in a scene would keep me from needing to assume, so fuk them.
Did he say he can see future? If so I totally missed that
He did which confused me. He never has visions of the future that I have seen or he has stated facts from. Only the past. Maybe he has not developed this skill yet? I don't know... seems off to me.
Well, didn't they just establish that in the very scene your bitching about![]()
Maybe others feel they have already established this, I would say they want me to assume it, and 20 seconds in a scene would keep me from needing to assume, so fuk them.
At the very least, it made all the crazy shit between Sansa and Arya make sense as they were just running a con of their own to take down LF and were united all along. Not really sure why you're concerned there was evidence lacking? When was a preponderance of evidence required in GOT? Doesn't matter who should believe in Bran or not cause LF was basically reduced to begging Sansa for mercy..
I did make mention of how the dragons should have already been used to take out Euron's fleet.
I think what they're doing here is setting up Theon's redemption by having him go find Yara and then ultimately catching up and killing Euron some how.
The way the Baleish trial felt to me, evidence had already been given to those in the room. None of what Sansa had to say seemed to have come as a surprise... No "gasps" no shouts of "prove it"... Nothing but silence. And when Baleish asked for assistance and sanctuary he was immediately denied, no question. Looked to me as if the only one surprised was Baleish.
Funniest scene to me was the Bran/Sam encounter. Some funny dialog there.
Yes, he did. It was only one line in a scene. May have been 2-3 episodes ago.
What evidence? There is no evidence to provide except from a lying Sansa and Bran's visions. What hard evidence could possibly have been revealed off screen and why would anyone expect such evidence to be provided off screen? It's just shitty writing bro. No need to pretend some evidence exists. If they had actual evidence then they wouldn't have need Bran to reveal shit that only he would be able to reveal. There is no proof he told Lyssa and the only evidence he killed Lyssa comes from Sansa who officially claimed she committed suicide.