- Joined:
- Sep 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 41,927
- Liked Posts:
- 15,379
I'm guessing he hasn't given her a 2nd thought.Any idea why Bronn was in King's Landing, but never bothered to even mention his Sand Snake lover?
You can't make it too obvious to the viewers or the con is not as impressive in the end. Could have thrown some of that trolling in though. Bran definitely deserved it.I coulda used a couple scenes with Bran giving Sansa/Arya info and proving his 3-eyed raven powers.
Also, side note... I hope Bran trolled Sansa off screen.... just constantly sneaking up all "I am the 3-eyed Raven"
They should do GoT blooper reels...
"I am the 3-eyed raven"
"I know Bran, you've said that, now eat your peas"
"3-eyed ravens can't eat peas"
"Why not?"
"Too many eyes"
"That doesn't make any sense Bran"
"Bran isn't here right now, can the 3-eyed raven take a message?"
"Yes, tell Bran to eat his peas"
"The 3-eyed raven refuses"
"Bran.... I mean 3-eyed raven, just eat your fucking peas"
"Fine... but the 3-eyed raven will continue to awkwardly bring up your rape"
"I thought you were the 3-eyed raven"
"I am"
Would much prefer a sequel to a prequel but have only heard prequel.Game of Thrones will definitely have a sequel... guaranteed.
To perform the bait and switch as they did, Sansa and Arya would have had to have been on the same page for longer than you suggest. Arya knew LF was leading her to the letter so took it cause he expected her to and wanted him to believe his plan was working. If Sansa wants LF to think she's suspicious of her sister, she'd do things like go through her room and what not. When they first speak of the letter, I can certainly imagine LF, in hiding, listening in.This is a lot more interesting discussion IMO. Actually, it was Sansa that warned Bran about LF. His response to Sansa was "It doesn't matter, I don't want it". Not, "Yes, I already know". Bran not knowing everything about the past, but having access to it, was clearly laid out for us in the Samwell/Bran scene. It's not a stretch to think Bran replayed Ned's betrayal, in which LF was a minor player, and not do a complete history search on him. After-all, you would think Jon's heritage would have been of at least equal importance. As to why he didn't, I can only say I think he is working on more pressing matters atm, the NK.
Again, if it was a long con, why did we have the scenes in which arya confronted Sansa about Rob's letter?
Why the scene where Sansa is secretly searching Arya's room and stumbles across the faces?
None of that makes sense unless you think Sansa and Arya staged those meetings under the assumption that LF was watching. I really think that is a stretch.
Do you remember when Sansa and Arya were speaking together after LF was killed? First thing said in that conversation was when Arya asks Sansa, "are you alright?" Not the thing to ask if she was really worried Sansa had been ready to pass sentence on her rather than LF. More like it was a long ordeal that is finally over. They then talk together as sisters do, still the hint of that little sibling rivalry but still supporting each other cause the pack survives.
Last edited: