- Joined:
- Jan 11, 2014
- Posts:
- 6,876
- Liked Posts:
- 4,284
- Location:
- Chicago
I'd prefer him over Rodgers.If you wanna stick to QB…what about Joe Burrow?
how bad would the bengals be without him?
I'd prefer him over Rodgers.If you wanna stick to QB…what about Joe Burrow?
how bad would the bengals be without him?
I just gave you one. There are 32 starting QBs in the NFL and Dak is ranked 17th oer QBR. Dak has the Cowboys as the 2nd seed in the NFC.
There is really no rational argument that the Pack are not a playoff team with Dak.
By contrast it is obvious that without Taylor, the Colts would not be a playoff team. Again he has double the yards and 3 times the TDs as the 17th ranked RB.
Over “Rogers?” That’s an easy choiceThat is just cherry picking stats. Wentz is ranked 8th in QBR.
You put Rogers on the Colts and take away Taylor he would make the playoffs, and would probably have a better record. Teams that have a top run game and lose their top back, usually continue to run the ball well still. Look at Johnson for Cleveland. He played against the Broncos and Patriots and had 250 yards rushing. I am sure there are more examples. The QB position is not so interchangeable.
Here is my thinking why i'd never pick a RB. If the score is 17-14 with 30 secs left this weekend and the Colts have the ball, who would you want on your team Taylor or Rogers?
Right?!I'd prefer him over Rodgers.
My bad, I had autofill on and I spelled his name wrong. ?Over “Rogers?” That’s an easy choice
Hub is an attention whore. He wanted attention and he got it.
This is two attention whores having an asshole contest. There are no winners.Hub is an attention whore. He wanted attention and he got it.
That is just cherry picking stats. Wentz is ranked 8th in QBR.
You put Rogers on the Colts and take away Taylor he would make the playoffs, and would probably have a better record. Teams that have a top run game and lose their top back, usually continue to run the ball well still. Look at Johnson for Cleveland. He played against the Broncos and Patriots and had 250 yards rushing. I am sure there are more examples. The QB position is not so interchangeable.
Here is my thinking why i'd never pick a RB. If the score is 17-14 with 30 secs left this weekend and the Colts have the ball, who would you want on your team Taylor or Rogers?
Nonsense. The original intent was to recognize the best player. That's how Ernie Banks and Ted Williams won the award playing on bad teams. In the 80's ESPN campaigned to change the definition to best player that helped their team to either win the championship or contend. Otherise great players on bad teams could never win the awardNot best player, that would be BPA, it's the most VALUABLE. So to me, that's a guy you take out and the team falls apart. Sadly, though I HATE Rodgers, and even more NOW, he may BE the MVP.
Nonsense. The original intent was to recognize the best player. That's how Ernie Banks and Ted Williams won the award playing on bad teams. In the 80's ESPN campaigned to change the definition to best player that helped their team to either win the championship or contend. Otherise great players on bad teams could never win the award
No one spews empty bullshit quite like Hub.
Well yeah, their last hero lied something like 37 times a day in public.Valuing responsibility and truthfulness is "hard left" now, is it?
Very disappointing. He should have stood his ground. Everything he said was spot on.
Wow
Oh he basically did. It was a non-apology apologyVery disappointing. He should have stood his ground. Everything he said was spot on.
You would say that regardless of what he said.Oh he basically did. It was a non-apology apology
I think that maybe perhaps this Hub hateration from yourselve is literally stemming from the FACT that you're literally "mad jelly" that he acturally has legitimate sources for his bears news and rumours meanwhilst your have your dabearsblog whomst is just a regurgitated spewage of stuff that acturally sources from real sources and deeply downward you wish you had an ounce of the credibility that Hub possesses which is moreso pounds and pounds of credibility like weighing even more than all of your breakfastses put together into one singular breakfast.Wow
Just wow
That whole article was a non apology and was written from the perspective a guy who was definitely scared of having his vote taken away from him, while at the same time remaining unapologetic and in fact blaming the people he was talking with for "walking him into" the conversation of the MVP.
This truly shows what a spineless coward hub arkush is, and I hope his cohorts that spent today at the score defending him read this and realize he just blamed them for his own actions.
That is a snake of the highest order.
Reading that non-apology of an article and just how mely-mouthed and narcissistic it was in its non-apology makes me hope all the more he does have that vote taken away from him because by God he certainly doesn't deserve it and that article proved it.
I think that maybe perhaps this Hub hateration from yourselve is literally stemming from the FACT that you're literally "mad jelly" that he acturally has legitimate sources for his bears news and rumours meanwhilst your have your dabearsblog whomst is just a regurgitated spewage of stuff that acturally sources from real sources and deeply downward you wish you had an ounce of the credibility that Hub possesses which is moreso pounds and pounds of credibility like weighing even more than all of your breakfastses put together into one singular breakfast.Wow
Just wow
That whole article was a non apology and was written from the perspective a guy who was definitely scared of having his vote taken away from him, while at the same time remaining unapologetic and in fact blaming the people he was talking with for "walking him into" the conversation of the MVP.
This truly shows what a spineless coward hub arkush is, and I hope his cohorts that spent today at the score defending him read this and realize he just blamed them for his own actions.
That is a snake of the highest order.
Reading that non-apology of an article and just how mely-mouthed and narcissistic it was in its non-apology makes me hope all the more he does have that vote taken away from him because by God he certainly doesn't deserve it and that article proved it.
I think that maybe perhaps this Hub hateration from yourselve is literally stemming from the FACT that you're literally "mad jelly" that he acturally has legitimate sources for his bears news and rumours meanwhilst your have your dabearsblog whomst is just a regurgitated spewage of stuff that acturally sources from real sources and deeply downward you wish you had an ounce of the credibility that Hub possesses which is moreso pounds and pounds of credibility like weighing even more than all of your breakfastses put together into one singular breakfast.
I think that maybe perhaps this Hub hateration from yourselve is literally stemming from the FACT that you're literally "mad jelly" that he acturally has legitimate sources for his bears news and rumours meanwhilst your have your dabearsblog whomst is just a regurgitated spewage of stuff that acturally sources from real sources and deeply downward you wish you had an ounce of the credibility that Hub possesses which is moreso pounds and pounds of credibility like weighing even more than all of your breakfastses put together into one singular breakfast.