- Joined:
- Jan 4, 2011
- Posts:
- 46,723
- Liked Posts:
- 34,369
- Location:
- Chicago
See, the problem with this argument BM is that I need to know who would have beaten had Lovie gotten a good OC? Hester? Aromashadu? Bradley? I just don't see the "gems"(Angelo speak), that never blossomed under Drake or Lovie.
The problem always was TALENT. And that falls SQUARELY on the Ange"loof". As evidence, you see that once a new GM comes in a gets a REAL wr, you saw the results.
You CAN'T miss that much on draft picks(especially high ones) and not expect that there would not be an affect. It's the reason we HAD to sign bums like R. Williams....
BEARS
thomas, you have to admit that we weren't exactly running a brain trust in OCs. Shea -- screen pass on 3rd and long, or really whatever down. Turner seemed stubborn to the point of obtuse (sometimes running too much, other times passing too much), and I tend to defend him more than a lot of people do. Martz was great in his prime but ran such a bespoke and outdated mad scientist offense that nobody liked it until he gave in and let us run more. Tice was, well, Tice. Who couldn't see that train wreck coming aside from a sizable portion of toolsheds on the CBMB.
As the HC, unfortunately, neglect in that department falls on you and I've heard it directly from a player that Lovie more or less didn't even deal with the O but left it up to his coordinators. Delegation? Fine. But come on.
And if we are going to skew towards one phase over another, why not offense for fucking once in the Bears history, you know?