If I'm Mitchs agent I tell him to not play

Bearly

Guest
You are missing the point. The point is Cutler made his trade demand in March of 2009. What would make 3M a pussy is doing it in the middle of the season. If 3M was upset about Foles then he should have manned the **** up and made a trade demand after the Foles trade. He would look like a pussy now because you want him to quit on the team in the middle of the season when he is due to be a free agent anyway.

Whether you agree with it or not Cutler dealt with his situation like a man. He was pissed off and he confronted the Broncos and McD directly immediately. What you are suggesting is 3M handle the situation like a whiny child by waiting several months after the Foles trade and then hide behind his agent and doctors.
This and he was lied to by McD. He didn't want to start his relationship with a new coach that lied to him and play any longer for an owner not true to his word. Other teams saw this as an opportunity to steal away Cutler on his rookie deal from a desperate Broncos without options. Unless somebody thinks anyone would have traded us 2 1sts and their starting QB last offseason for Mitch, how the **** is this the same?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

airtime143

This place is dead and buried.
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
14,992
Liked Posts:
14,795
To be clear, McDaniel's was looking for a treasure chest for Cutler if he could get Cassels for the right price. Just normal GM stuff. McD's a dick but Cutler's reaction was partially due to the owner telling him he had a home there that wouldn't be affected by the coaching change. Just a shit show all around. The only guy that wasn't lying was Jay and he was viewed as much the victim as anything else.

A very different situation than a backup QB ditching a team that needs him in the middle of a contract year. If Mitch and his agent wanted an out, they could have cut his shoulder that could like use the tightening up and give him an angle on reclamation that no one would question.

I have always thought Cutler was a pud- but you are right about him being viewed as a victim in that situation.
He was a young guy with warts, but also with significant positives.
To get a new coach that IMMEDIATELY wants to bring in a guy he worked with before a single down is played... Jay reacted wisely.

in hindsight, we know the whole situation was a mess.

But, at that moment, Cassel was a guy who just went 10-5, was only 1 year older than jay, and having McDaniels prefer a guy he worked with was less an indictment of cutler than it was love for Cassel.
It was a perfect storm to fleece the bears.
 

Bearly

Guest
I have always thought Cutler was a pud- but you are right about him being viewed as a victim in that situation.
He was a young guy with warts, but also with significant positives.
To get a new coach that IMMEDIATELY wants to bring in a guy he worked with before a single down is played... Jay reacted wisely.

in hindsight, we know the whole situation was a mess.

But, at that moment, Cassel was a guy who just went 10-5, was only 1 year older than jay, and having McDaniels prefer a guy he worked with was less an indictment of cutler than it was love for Cassel.
It was a perfect storm to fleece the bears.
and seemingly Denver. We only got the deal in front of other teams due to MCD preferring Orton to the other stop gap QB offered. The rest of the offers by those in the bidding war were essentially the same.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,319
Liked Posts:
2,661
You are missing the point. The point is Cutler made his trade demand in March of 2009. What would make 3M a pussy is doing it in the middle of the season. If 3M was upset about Foles then he should have manned the **** up and made a trade demand after the Foles trade. He would look like a pussy now because you want him to quit on the team in the middle of the season when he is due to be a free agent anyway.

Whether you agree with it or not Cutler dealt with his situation like a man. He was pissed off and he confronted the Broncos and McD directly immediately. What you are suggesting is 3M handle the situation like a whiny child by waiting several months after the Foles trade and then hide behind his agent and doctors.
The foles trade wasnt the problem because Mitch was a man and knew he was a better player and would win the job.. like what happened.. and then got benched when he was undefeated and when it was completely obvious to everyone after a few games that was a HUGE mistake going to foles and rather then go back to Mitch, Nagy stuck with foles, and on top of that he got his throwing shoulder hurt on a fucking stupid wild cat play that everybody knew that Mitch was going to run.. So the reason that the **** YOU to the bears didn't come in the off season was because the "**** YOU" to Mitch happened DURING THE SEASON.

Stop being a fucking moron, you know this
 

HeHateMe

He/Himz/Hiz
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
61,532
Liked Posts:
54,935
The foles trade wasnt the problem because Mitch was a man and knew he was a better player and would win the job.. like what happened.. and then got benched when he was undefeated and when it was completely obvious to everyone after a few games that was a HUGE mistake going to foles and rather then go back to Mitch, Nagy stuck with foles, and on top of that he got his throwing shoulder hurt on a fucking stupid wild cat play that everybody knew that Mitch was going to run.. So the reason that the **** YOU to the bears didn't come in the off season was because the "**** YOU" to Mitch happened DURING THE SEASON.

Stop being a fucking moron, you know this
Lol
 

Penny Traitor

バカでも才能は一つ
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
12,198
Liked Posts:
16,514
Location:
Chicago
The foles trade wasnt the problem because Mitch was a man and knew he was a better player and would win the job.. like what happened.. and then got benched when he was undefeated and when it was completely obvious to everyone after a few games that was a HUGE mistake going to foles and rather then go back to Mitch, Nagy stuck with foles, and on top of that he got his throwing shoulder hurt on a fucking stupid wild cat play that everybody knew that Mitch was going to run..

100% pure speculation on your part.

Otherwise, I am sure this "IT WAS EVERYBODY'S FAULT BUT MINE!" strategy works all the time in real world.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
30,449
Liked Posts:
25,656
Deal, You having to write Trumps name on the ticket (making it so your not actually voting) can only help America

Did you see this shit

images


Some bitchboy made a fake candidate with the same last name as the democrat to help this trump ***** win in florida. LOL
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,319
Liked Posts:
2,661
100% pure speculation on your part.

Otherwise, I am sure this "IT WAS EVERYBODY'S FAULT BUT MINE!" strategy works all the time in real world.
Not much of a speculation really. The problems happened during the season not before the season so Remy demanding that Mitch "act like a man" like Cutler before the season is stupid.
 

Penny Traitor

バカでも才能は一つ
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
12,198
Liked Posts:
16,514
Location:
Chicago
Not much of a speculation really.

It's speculation that Trubisky was named the week one starter because he is a better quarterback.

It's speculation that turning to Foles and continuing to stay with Foles is a "big mistake".

It's speculation that using Trubisky in the Wildcat formation was "stupid".

It's also speculation that "everyone knew he was going to run".
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
65,959
Liked Posts:
42,476
The foles trade wasnt the problem because Mitch was a man and knew he was a better player and would win the job.. like what happened.. and then got benched when he was undefeated and when it was completely obvious to everyone after a few games that was a HUGE mistake going to foles and rather then go back to Mitch, Nagy stuck with foles, and on top of that he got his throwing shoulder hurt on a fucking stupid wild cat play that everybody knew that Mitch was going to run.. So the reason that the **** YOU to the bears didn't come in the off season was because the "**** YOU" to Mitch happened DURING THE SEASON.

Stop being a fucking moron, you know this

He got benched because he sucked against the 30th ranked defense. It wasn't obvious it was a huge mistake because after Atl, Foles immediately faced much better defenses than 3M. He faced the 1st, 3rd, 22nd, 2nd, 4th, 25th, 24th. So 4 of his games were against top 5 defense in yards allowed. That is absurd. It really didn't become apparent he sucked until he continued to struggle against the Titans and Vikings who are 25th and 24th on D.

So stop being a fucking moron, you know this. QBs perform worse against top 5 defenses than they do the 30th ranked D. If 3M had sucked against Indy instead of the Falcons then he wouldn't have been benched.


You are really being football stupid by comparing performance against the Lions and Giants with performance against the Colts, Bucs, Rams, and Saints ie 4 top 5 defenses. I actually have no problem going to 3M now but that is because Foles sucked against the last two teams whose defenses are not good so based on teams faced, this is really the first real opportunity where it would be fair to replace Foles because he has actually faced defenses at least comparable to the shit defenses 3M faced early in the season.

If 3M and his agent can't understand that then they are both as football stupid as you are.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
30,449
Liked Posts:
25,656
He got benched because he sucked against the 30th ranked defense. It wasn't obvious it was a huge mistake because after Atl, Foles immediately faced much better defenses than 3M. He faced the 1st, 3rd, 22nd, 2nd, 4th, 25th, 24th. So 4 of his games were against top 5 defense in yards allowed. That is absurd. It really didn't become apparent he sucked until he continued to struggle against the Titans and Vikings who are 25th and 24th on D.

So stop being a fucking moron, you know this. QBs perform worse against top 5 defenses than they do the 30th ranked D. If 3M had sucked against Indy instead of the Falcons then he wouldn't have been benched.


You are really being football stupid by comparing performance against the Lions and Giants with performance against the Colts, Bucs, Rams, and Saints ie 4 top 5 defenses. I actually have no problem going to 3M now but that is because Foles sucked against the last two teams whose defenses are not good so based on teams faced, this is really the first real opportunity where it would be fair to replace Foles because he has actually faced defenses at least comparable to the shit defenses 3M faced early in the season.

If 3M and his agent can't understand that then they are both as football stupid as you are.

Nah, foles looked like shit from the moment he left that ATL field.

7 TDS and 7 INT's in todays nfl, in 7 games, is god awful. He's the worst starting bears QB ive seen in a while.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
65,959
Liked Posts:
42,476
Nah, foles looked like shit from the moment he left that ATL field.

7 TDS and 7 INT's in todays nfl, in 7 games, is god awful. He's the worst starting bears QB ive seen in a while.

This has nothing to do with the point. Foles looked bad against 4 top 5 defenses and there is nothing in 3M's history that suggests he wouldn't have fared the same because he has generally sucked against good defenses.

No one is saying Foles played well against the Colts, Bucs, Saints or Rams. I am simply saying it isn't a fair comparison to just look at their stats because one faced significantly tougher competition. The only game in which both Foles and Trubs faced the same competition, Foles was much much much much much better.

If you think any coach in the NFL is going to ignore the strength of competition when evaluating QBs then that is just absurd.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,319
Liked Posts:
2,661
This has nothing to do with the point. Foles looked bad against 4 top 5 defenses and there is nothing in 3M's history that suggests he wouldn't have fared the same because he has generally sucked against good defenses.

No one is saying Foles played well against the Colts, Bucs, Saints or Rams. I am simply saying it isn't a fair comparison to just look at their stats because one faced significantly tougher competition. The only game in which both Foles and Trubs faced the same competition, Foles was much much much much much better.

If you think any coach in the NFL is going to ignore the strength of competition when evaluating QBs then that is just absurd.

the point is Foles sucks right now in the middle of the season, Mitch got hurt because Nagy is fucking Special person and put him in the wildcat in the middle of the season. So you saying that Mitch should have told the Bears to get fucked in the beginning of the season like Cutler did is Special person
 

Top