It doesn't matter if he plays for minimum wage, HE'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO WIN WITH. What part of that do you not understand?
This is strictly your opinion and I fear that you are losing your 'Captain Objectivity' moniker. Cutler is not a world beater, that's clear. But the club of Superbowl winning QBs is littered with people with stats very similar to Cutler's. Eli Manning (both times) and Joe Flacco are the most obvious ones in recent memory. In both of Manning's wins and Flacco's they went on ridiculous runs at the right time. Here's a list of all the Superbowl winning Qbs going back to 2007, including Cutler's lines from his last two full completed seasons.
He's definitely good enough to win with. Doesn't mean it will happen, every year the winner usually tends to go on a ridiculous run in the playoffs. There's nothing that says Cutler can't do that.
Hate him all you want, that's fine. There are plenty of reasons to do so. But saying "HE"S NOT GOOD ENOUGHT O WIN WITH." is not a correct statement.
Completions Attempts Completion % Yards Tds Ints Sack Rating
Cutler '12 255 434 58.8 3,033 19 14 38 81.3
Cutler '10 261 432 60.4 3,274 23 16 52 86.3
Flacco '12 290 488 59.4 3,238 18 17 41 77
Rodgers ' 10 312 475 65.7 3,922 28 11 31 101.2
Brees 09 363 514 70.6 4,388 34 11 20 109.6
Big Ben '08 337 506 66.6 4,328 26 12 50 100.5
Manning '11 359 589 61 4,933 29 16 28 92.9
Manning '07 297 529 56.1 3,336 23 20 27 73.9
Edit: Sorry dudes, I tried real hard to line all this shit up...just isn't in the cards I guess.