Yes, we have already established that you dont actually watch any of the games and basically just look at the statistics to make your determinations. That was obvious from the start, and reinforced as you have failed to actually explain any coherent description of Minshew or Hurts' play the backs up your wildly optimistic appraisal of their abilities.
He looks downfield. Tell me, where else would he look? Upfield? To the sideline? At his phone? You should run a quarterback camp with these oustanding scouting observations.
Yeah he's supremely talented, his game is just limited at this point.
Think they drafted Hurts just to have a potentially good backup for an injury prone Wentz they're on the hook for 128 mil. Of Course, they'll seek to trade him but what team, in their right mind, would take on that behemoth contract for such an unproven commodity. Do think there is a potential out in '22 but Eagles would still have to absorb massive dead cap hit to get rid of him before next season.
No, you "refuted" my point by making completely wrong observations that would be immediately refuted by anyone who actually had watched Gardner Minshew or Jalen Hurts play. If Minshew was as great as you say why has Mike Glennon and Jake Luton started in his place? Why are the Jaguars jumping for joy that they are now in the driver's seat for Trevor Lawrence? I mean, he has such good numbers, right?
Except Wentz already crying about he wants to go if not the starter.
I am honestly telling you that are you so entirely full of shit and so obviously making everything up as you go along (like Jalen Hurts as a 6'2 version of Russell Wilson....lol) that I do not know what you mean. That is correct, I am honestly baffled by your inability to even guess correctly at the profile of these players.
Immovable due to the contract. I dont know what happens in Philadelphia this off-season, it's very obvious that Pederson wants to roll with Hurts and Roseman would prefer Wentz.Except Wentz already crying about he wants to go if not the starter.
Report: Carson Wentz wants out, if he’s not the starter
At a time when the Eagles already are trying to set the stage for trading quarterback Carson Wentz (step one: act like you’re not interested in trading him), Wentz isn’t inclined to help the Eagles maximize their leverage. Adam Schefter of ESPN.com reports that Wentz is “not interested” in...sports.yahoo.com
Except our threshold for acceptable quarterback play is not "better than Mitch Trubisky" since "better than Mitch Trubisky" applies to quite a few other shitty quarterbacks who I dont want. You want to argue that body of work Minshew is better than Trubisky? Fine, whatever. It's like arguing over which kind of cancer is best to have. Fact is the Bears are hunting for the answer at the quarterback position, not a bunch of new questions. Gardner Minshew solves nothing, and his absence from the Bears roster is absolutely not worth losing our minds over.
Never thought Minshew was any better than a decent backup. He nor Mitch have much command of reading defense. Gardener has better deep accuracy. Mitch still wins due to better mobility and better short/mid pass game.
He promised to draft one every year, that's right. But your odds of finding a good quarterback outside the top hundred picks are slim-to-none. Since Tom Brady I can count four times a good quarterback has been selected outside the top hundred picks, and I'm really stretching the definition of "good" when I include the likes of David Garrard and Kyle Orton. Realistically its just Kirk Cousins and Dak Prescott.
Well even that's just a bad philosophy to have. Throwing away draft picks, even late draft picks, isn't a good way to win games.
