Jeff Samardzija and Jason Hammel traded to Oakland Athletics for Addison Russell plus

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
I guess I'm confused....when Theo Baseball says the Cubs goal every year is to win a World Series, and every season is sacred, we're supposed to take that literally?
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
I guess I'm confused....when Theo Baseball says the Cubs goal every year is to win a World Series, and every season is sacred, we're supposed to take that literally?

And this has what to do with what?
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
The last 6 post state things that were never said. Reading comprehension must be lacking on the Southside.
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
And this has what to do with what?

Taking statements GMs make literally, or not.

Just saying, you seem to firmly believe in Cashman's statements in regards to Tanaka.

I'm more outraged/appalled that the Cubs have considered the past two seasons sacred.
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
These are the guys that soak up innings for you, usually with average to slightly above-average performance, but who don't meet the standards to be a One/Two. For weaker teams, a Number Three may take the first slot in the rotation and be the de-facto ace. There is usually a fairly clear dividing line between a Number Three and Number One/Two. It's like pornography; you know it when you see it.

That pretty much describes Shark to a T.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
That pretty much describes Shark to a T.
If we accept those definitions he has the tools to be a 2. Whether he becomes that or not is frankly open to debate, but he certainly has two plus pitches right now.
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
A guy to soak up innings, but who isn't as good or consistent or durable as a solid Three. The styles here can vary wildly. Some of these guys are control artists who lack plus stuff, others have plenty of stuff but don't command it well.

I see a lot of shark in 3-4-5 category, not the 1-2.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
Taking statements GMs make literally, or not.

Just saying, you seem to firmly believe in Cashman's statements in regards to Tanaka.

I'm more outraged/appalled that the Cubs have considered the past two seasons sacred.
Did you actually read what I wrote?
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
If we accept those definitions he has the tools to be a 2. Whether he becomes that or not is frankly open to debate, but he certainly has two plus pitches right now.

He can be a 2 on the Cubs...but I don't think Shark is a 2 on a playoff contending team. JMO.
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
So, you agree that he is a 3 present time but you dont think his ceiling is any higher.

Pretty much, I see him as a 3 on a playoff caliber team. The lower Shark is in a rotation, the better the team will be.
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
Pretty much, I see him as a 3 on a playoff caliber team. The lower Shark is in a rotation, the better the team will be.

Well, a good number of scouts and people disagree but to each their own.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
He can be a 2 on the Cubs...but I don't think Shark is a 2 on a playoff contending team. JMO.

This is what I don't think you understand. These terms are not team dependent. It isn't about where they slot on a particular team's rotation. If you put Felix Hernadez on the Dodgers it doesn't make him a 2. Look I can accept that Samardzija's results will never match his stuff. That he will be a guy who consistently underperforms his peripherals. But there are the tools to be a front of the rotation starter there, and that is why quite a few teams have called the Cubs in regards to Shark.
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
Nope. I'll defer to the scouts who see him as a 2.

He has a ceiling of a 2. They think he is a 3 right now. He is not Yu Darvish or thought of as Yu Darvish.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
He has a ceiling of a 2. They think he is a 3 right now. He is not Yu Darvish or thought of as Yu Darvish.

please back yourself up.

he is not a 2 nor does he have the ceiling of a 2 nor does he have the stuff to be a 2 on a contending team. stop sipping the fucking kool aid. he looks better because he is on the cubs. fact.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
This is what I don't think you understand. These terms are not team dependent. It isn't about where they slot on a particular team's rotation. If you put Felix Hernadez on the Dodgers it doesn't make him a 2. Look I can accept that Samardzija's results will never match his stuff. That he will be a guy who consistently underperforms his peripherals. But there are the tools to be a front of the rotation starter there, and that is why quite a few teams have called the Cubs in regards to Shark.

they called for a back end of the rotation innings eater!!!!!!!! my god dude.
 

Top