So much of what makes a QB good is pre-snap. Making sure you are never running a play into a bad look is half the battle and where Trubisky struggles a lot.
That is why I would be fine with Fromm in the 2nd.
This scheme is about getting the ball where it needs to be when it needs to be there.
No doubt. There have been many QBs who either have physical limitations or only 'meh' college stats end up pretty good in the NFL. Remember this specimen:
I agree with you when talking pre-snap. Fromm is a smart guy and I could easily see him do well in the NFL. The issue I have is where he'll be drafted there are many comparable QBs, so it's more around what you want. IMHO the top 2 are locks (Burrow and Tua). After that I can't see someone taking Fromm over Herbert or Eason. After that he's in line for the #5 spot, but if you want a better athlete Love or maybe Costello. I'd add in that 2-3 round range you are drafting someone to develop, not a starter. Why not take the better athlete?
I'd also not entirely forget about Jalen Hurts. Extremely different prospect, but he did well in a gimmicky offense on a national stage. Some have Lamar Jackson comparables. I'm not there, but I also recognize Lamar did drop over concerns over his uncle Rico passing motion and his overall accuracy. Personally I think Hurts projects better in a Taysom Hill type role for an offense. Granted, Taysom Hill was undrafted, but there's no denying the value of that type of player in the right system creates interesting mismatches.
Anyway, I think there's a lot of competition where Fromm will end up going. He'll probably win someone over in a close door interview, meaning we will not see it coming.