- Joined:
- Aug 22, 2012
- Posts:
- 10,552
- Liked Posts:
- 6,868
- Location:
- Indiana
(Rotoworld)The Chicago Tribune reports the Bears had "pervasive doubts" about Martellus Bennett's commitment.
Analysis: Per reporter Dan Wiederer, Bennett offered "minimal effort to conform to the unselfish and focus-driven culture" the Bears are trying to instill under coach John Fox. Wiederer also confirms Bennett's late season ribs injury, which landed him on injured reserve for four games, was essentially a sham. In the end, the sides' divorce boiled down to the fact that Bennett wanted a better contract and the Bears were dead set against it. So is life for a player in a league where teams monopolize the negotiating power with non-guaranteed deals.
(Rotoworld) Martellus Bennett and Rob Gronkowski lead all tight ends in yards after contact since 2013.
Analysis: Gronk is No. 1, with Bennett close behind. Bennett showed signs of decline last season— he missed five games with injury while averaging an anemic 8.3 yards per catch— but could bounce back as a big part of the Patriots' offense. Bennett just turned 29, and is a proven playmaker who scored at least five touchdowns every year between 2012-14. Bennett could be a low-end TE1 even with Gronk being the focal point of the Patriots' offense.
So...there is good and bad with Bennett, but I think we can see why he is no longer a Bear.
Thanks for the post. But I think anyone with an IQ above that of an eggplant could see why MB isn't on the team. The Bears issues with him have been widely reported. He is 29 and this will be his 4th team; he wears out his welcome quickly. I can see why some might want to put up with his shenanigans because of his obvious talent. That argument has some validity. But it certainly doesn't trump an administration's desire to get everyone on the same page and get buy in from the team. Pretty simple.