- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
Yeah I mean Melo could die in a plane crash on his way to Chicago.Can you at the very least admit that the trade would be risky?
How "risky" would you like the trade to be?
Every trade involves a certain amount of risk.
That doesn't mean that this trade is still a no brainer...minute risk there or not.
You'd be giving up two "quality starters" for one of the BEST PLAYERS IN THE NBA.You would be essentially giving up two quality starters for one.
You're not losing any depth at the SF position. You're gaining talent. And you're losing depth at center..where you are already thin and I already covered that scenario back on PAGE FUCKING ONE.You were talking about depth being important before... that plays into depth.
Jesus H Christ.
Yeah assuming we make no other moves after the trade to help at center...eitehr this season or next season...which would be a Special person assumption to make.You were talking about Miami seemingly having a better front-court. That trade ensures they will long into the future - by leaps and bounds.
AGAIN: PAGE FUCKING ONE.
You and Lefty were talking about doing financially smart decisions... and now you have back-tracked off of that just to make your point that 'Miami and LA have spent big money on contracts and it has paid off so that means we should too.'
No, I haven't backed off that. I was offering a counter point to your idea that the Bulls somehow need to be smart with money because of some hypothetical CBA. When you compare the Bulls to the league after this trade they'd still be fine considering what other teams are doing. So you have no point...and.............
So being smart with money is only important when it jussssssst so happens to help your arguement, eh?
You are fucking clueless. Honestly.
Fail. The Bulls would be smart with the money no matter what. Rather than overpaying Deng and overpaying/paying Noah you'd be putting a max deal at market value to one of the best players in the league. If the CBA doesn't change that's smart money...and if the CBA changes it'd still be smart money. Unless you are somehow asserting that LA, Boston, Miami, etc are currently being stupid with their money?
I feel that regardless of some possible hypothetical future CBA that LA, Boston, Miami are all spending money wisely. Therefore if the Bulls were to spend like them it would be smart no matter what the CBA does. That was the point of bringing up the other teams. I wasn't pointing out they were stupidly or unwisely spending money..I was pointing out they were spending it in general even in the face of this new CBA....and that the Bulls should follow suit......and those teams arein championship contention and will be for the foreseeable future.