RK, that's what I was thinking with the Richards contract. If we take him, it's great for the top lines of the offense, but then we are right back where we started in terms of filling those bottom 6 with better than 500k players.
While I'm not a fan of John Scott, I'm wondering if we'd be better off on D playing with him during the year, then look for a rental tough d-man at the trade deadline ...giving us that sandpaper when we really need it...and giving more flex for the forwards during the year.
I don't think I'd want to commit the years that Richards wants.
For a bottom 6 centre, I don't know how Reasoner did last year...seemed quiet (but he did play for Floida), but he's a pretty good faceoff winner if my memory served me.