The poster was suggesting GB had all or most of the leverage. I am saying you have to look at the situation from both sides. GB had more leverage than the poster is saying because the Jets are in win now mode and Rodgers represented their best chance at contending for a title. That translates into GB having leverage. Hence when I asked what was the alternative for the Jets I was met with silence.
Likewise, the Cards would have more leverage than you think because:
1. A team might view Murray as their best chance at winning now and thus will be willing to pay for that;
2. The Cards will have to eat a **** ton of dead cap in a Murray trade so no reason to do so unless they get something good;
3. Even if they sign a rookie they can carry a rookie QB on a rookie contract and Murray for some period of time and wait teams out as they are rebuilding and in no rush. A team trading for Murray is likely trying to win now and would want Murray in house in time to learn the offense and new teammates;
So there is really nothing wrong with Zona's bargaining position as they would not be forced to trade Murray. They would be willing to trade him at a price that makes sense for them. You dont eat 97m or 81m in dead cap for a 4th round pick. You are better off keeping him and waiting for a despearate team to come along or for him to get healthy and prove himself.
And I am saying that is not getting more than they should. That is market dynamics at work. If his demand goes up because teams are "desperate" then his cost goes up. If the supply of potential franchise QBs is limited then his cost goes up. That is how a market works.
What you are calling "desperation" is really the supply of potentially good QBs being outstripped by the demand for them. When demand > supply the end result is a higher cost. That is not "desperation" but basic economics.
Ok, well said. I just didn’t want to be painted as saying that Murray is only worth a fourth.
It’s difficult to make one’s complete point in a short post and at times people come to different conclusions on what they’ve read.
If this was easy, we would have tort reform and arguments in court as to what or how the law reads.
You’re obviously well written and more than likely intelligent. I don’t disagree with you on virtually everything bc anything could or will happen in this situation. The QB position is the great equalizer and rules can be thrown out of the window.
In simple terms, I help companies get the best deals in a variety of situations and positions and to me, Arizona is in the lesser position without regard as to how good any one GM or owner believes he is bc I don’t have this info.
It would be my opinion to give at most a fourth given what I know about Murray and his production (but I’m not a professional scout or football analytic) I think I’m good at it at my level but if a team does make a move for more than that- I would guess that organization is probably worse for the wear bc they shouldn’t have to!
I thank you for having an intellectual debate that has been well executed on your part. I have I think made myself clear that I didn’t disagree with you early on only that I never thought or said he is only worth a fourth. That was my only disagreement between us.
Keep making your points brother bears fan!