**OFFICAIL** Bears 2024 Regular Season News & Schleisse - FTO Preferred - No ALTS! Derailing Is Discouraged!

RiDLer80

First time, long time.
Joined:
Feb 16, 2014
Posts:
4,142
Liked Posts:
3,823
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Miami Hurricanes
  2. Northern Illinois Huskies
I was just opening up to the idea of the Bears pairing Barkley with Fields.
 
Joined:
Aug 6, 2020
Posts:
2,011
Liked Posts:
2,897
Barkley was a pipe dream anyway. Giants are gonna suck though, Jones isn’t that guy, and they got way too lucky in close games last year, once that flips they’ll be under .500 and will be calling for drafting a QB.
 

bears26

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 29, 2012
Posts:
23,754
Liked Posts:
27,262
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. Houston Rockets
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Oklahoma Sooners
Bears need a dynamic running back to compliment Fields. I like Jahmye Gibbs in the early second.
There are some pretty good RBs in the draft, including Gibbs. Barkley would have helped the Bears, however they should be able to find a very good caliber RB in the draft (without having to pay the hefty contract).
 

Montucky

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 21, 2020
Posts:
10,075
Liked Posts:
4,260
This draft is loaded at runningback and the Bears should be able to do a lot of moving down to accumulate a lot of picks. Not just from first overall. Glad the Giants franchise tagged Saquon Barkley, saved the Bears from themselves.
 

VickAshley✅️verified

✅️ verified member - He/Him/Himselve/Sir
Joined:
May 24, 2021
Posts:
1,706
Liked Posts:
2,460
Barkley was a pipe dream anyway. Giants are gonna suck though, Jones isn’t that guy, and they got way too lucky in close games last year, once that flips they’ll be under .500 and will be calling for drafting a QB.
I literally will never understand why the giants would pay the white Wish version of Feilds all of this money I mean are you literally ****ing kidding me?
 

Bears_Almighty

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Mar 21, 2022
Posts:
336
Liked Posts:
549
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  2. North Carolina Tar Heels
OK? I never said you couldn't think that or that I am paid by the Bears. I'm just saying, you're wasting your time wishing they provide competition or a bench spot for someone they have clearly shown they are all-in on. You're clearly free to waste your time, though, just as I am free to tell you why I think it is a waste.

Best case scenario is maybe they also love Paris Johnson and put him at LT because of being a top 10 pick, but even in that scenario, Jones is the starting RT and it's going to be without much competition, and frankly, on an OL with 5 below average starters, as the only 1 who stayed healthy all year, he's probably earned the chance to improve more than anyone.
I was just stating that you're acting like your opinion is the end all be all in regards to the LT position. All in on a 5th round rookie? He was labeled the starter on a team that was torn down. You have your thoughts and I have mine. I just want better out of my LT... that's it that's all. And if they move him to RT then so be it. IMHO he is currently below average as a pass protector and the tape clearly shows he needs a lot of work. He is trending up which is nice, but leaves a bit to be desired. That's all I'm saying. Appreciate the dialogue, but what you consider a waste of time may not be for someone else. That's why GMs are hired and fired all the time. Good day.
 

Rawk

Active member
Joined:
Mar 23, 2016
Posts:
126
Liked Posts:
146
There are some pretty good RBs in the draft, including Gibbs. Barkley would have helped the Bears, however they should be able to find a very good caliber RB in the draft (without having to pay the hefty contract).
True but I would rather use that pick on other needs since money is not a concern.
 

Montucky

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 21, 2020
Posts:
10,075
Liked Posts:
4,260
True but I would rather use that pick on other needs since money is not a concern.
Any position other than runningback and I'd agree, but the position usually ages so poorly that its not a good bet. The Bears can use a day three pick and get a productive player.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
63,468
Liked Posts:
40,477
This is the first domino to fall in my wild ass #calledit
If another team does end up getting Lamar, and the Ravens then trade with the Bears for Fields, it will be the #calledit of the millenia

More likely they trade up to one as will have a ton of first round picks to do so. Unless they want to offer multiple first rounders for Fields.

yes, yes they can. But they have to cut a lot of corners to match any offer North of 40 mil, that is why they used the non-exclusive tag. The question is, if some team gives him what he wants, or close, then what do they do?

Don't think 40m is the issue. He wants a fully or near fully guaranteed contract.
 

rawdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
8,013
Liked Posts:
6,460
Bears need a dynamic running back to compliment Fields. I like Jahmyr Gibbs in the early second.
My pipe dream now that Saquon is gone is a double trade back with Houston then like Carolina or Tennesee. Take JSN at 11. Get 33 from Houston and 40 or whatever from the Titans. Get the top edge guy at 33. Take Gibbs at 40. Then at 54 and 64 take the top 2 OL or OL/CB. Then have an extra 1 and 2 in 2024 and extra 1 in 2025
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
63,468
Liked Posts:
40,477
Last edited:

rawdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
8,013
Liked Posts:
6,460
I was just stating that you're acting like your opinion is the end all be all in regards to the LT position. All in on a 5th round rookie? He was labeled the starter on a team that was torn down. You have your thoughts and I have mine. I just want better out of my LT... that's it that's all. And if they move him to RT then so be it. IMHO he is currently below average as a pass protector and the tape clearly shows he needs a lot of work. He is trending up which is nice, but leaves a bit to be desired. That's all I'm saying. Appreciate the dialogue, but what you consider a waste of time may not be for someone else. That's why GMs are hired and fired all the time. Good day.
You're acting like my opinion is the end all be all. I never said it was. As always, my opinion is based on facts that are available. And it is a fact that Jones had a relatively successful rookie year without competition last year.

I apologize for saying it's a waste of time. This is a message board, you can talk about whatever you want. Don't mean to come off like I run anything. Just saying, you're setting yourself up for disappointment if you want Jones to get a serious competitor or moved to the bench. It's simply not going to happen.
 

Top