pdxbearsfan
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 8, 2021
- Posts:
- 5,662
- Liked Posts:
- 2,761
That looks totally out of whack.
That looks totally out of whack.
I didn't realize coming to a Bears message board and posting my thoughts on Bears football was irrelevant. Maybe I'm confused with what exactly this place is for?
I honestly don't give a shit what you said. I use to generally agree with your takes. I usually scroll for pages to avoid reading an endless argument that you create to make yourself feel smart now. I'm pretty certain you've never admitted to being wrong about anything. Even when you have been blatantly wrong you find a way to spin it as if you were somehow right. It gets old real quick
Right on.i think chicago is perfectly fine if jalen isnt there. otherwise they wouldn't have moved down to 9 and waited to see another offer shake out that was closer to where they can grab him easier
Do you know how to use the multi thread feature????I think we should all just discuss prospects and give thoughts on them. But please do continue on rambling about pff metrics youve discussed 100 times
I actually pulled out a take he had being wrong and he very graciously took it without an argument.Ok and I shared my opinion on a Bears message board and you decided to cry about it. I did not realize only opinions that agree with yours are allowed.
Right so you dont know what I said but decided to come and cry about it because you were triggered by me mentioning PFF in the past. So you admit you spoke out of ignorance. Good stuff.
I am pretty certain you have never admitted to being wrong about anything either. I mean you just came here running on about PFF and when told I didnt say shit about PFF, did you admit you were wrong or did you just say you dont care what I said? So stop being a hypocrite.
Based on last years class's performance, id settle for 20%It says he is human and will not hit on 100% of his decisions. Duh!
If that applied this would be a really good gotcha. Good try ret@rdDo you know how to use the multi thread feature????
When you understand that under 50% of 1st rounders are considered successful picks and less than 40% sign 2nd contracts with the teams that drafted them, easy doubles doesn't sound bad at all.interesting about JSN and him likely needing a high volume of targets...doesnt sound like a bears target
I actually pulled out a take he had being wrong and he very graciously took it without an argument.
I've been wrong on tons of things as well, as we all are besides you!
Once you have been proven wrong you just default to 'well it was correct at the time I said it' lmao
Carter, D Jones, Tippman, Brents. OLine gets help, DT gets best talent. Def backfield gets better. DE ignored is main issue.What makes sense?
Paris Johnson, Benton, Tippman, Hall
What my dumb brain wants to do?
Carter/JSN, Benton, Tippman, Duncan
and Poles 100% didn't go BPA last year and if he did, what the fuck does the Phallus Jones selection say about this guys ability to scout NFL talent?
Must be nice to spend months and months going back and forth about what players are worth drafting where, only for the GM to take a late round punt returner(who couldnt even field punts) in the 3rd and he gets the benefit of "well its his draft board" when the rest of the world say it as a complete reach.It says he misses like every GM ever.
But you already know this.
The Bears should throw more often to WRs who don't get YAC?he said he doesnt see him as a huge yac guy...if your not much of a yac guy then you need high volume of targets.
Half the people on this board are saying he has to get OL in the first.Literally no one has said that. You continue to pump this but I don't see anyone saying this.
That being said I'll go on record stating it would be a mistake to wait all the way to the 5th round to make an addition to the OL. Borom was bad, leatherwood was awful, jenkins is a moving puzzle piece with injury concerns who played well at guard.
The bears should use a pick in rounds 1-3 on a RT with expectations to come in and compete with current players, and likely win the job by early to mid season.
Must be nice to spend months and months going back and forth about what players are worth drafting where, only for the GM to take a late round punt returner(who couldnt even field punts) in the 3rd and he gets the benefit of "well its his draft board" when the rest of the world say it as a complete reach.
If the Packers drafted him there you guys would never stop making fun of them.
No they're not. Half the people or more are mocking OL in the first, or sharing information about other mocks showing OL in the first. I don't see people saying there is no other option but poles MUST draft OL in the first regardless of who is there.Half the people on this board are saying he has to get OL in the first.
I say that.Literally no one has said that. You continue to pump this but I don't see anyone saying this.
No they're not. Half the people or more are mocking OL in the first, or sharing information about other mocks showing OL in the first. I don't see people saying there is no other option but poles MUST draft OL in the first regardless of who is there.
Of course ... the annoyance is sometimes the message board does get stuff right, and calls a bad pick when they see it. Then people whine about someone having a negative opinion such as calling VJJ HESTER or DEBBO LITE. It's pretty comicalAgain. Every GM ever…. Even the absolute best ones make mistakes like this. You’re not stupid. You know this.