CaliBearFan
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 4, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,218
- Liked Posts:
- 1,296
Just stop!! You have no idea what you're talking about. Every poster on this board disagrees with you. Do you have some kind of twisted need to be ridiculed by others?
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 59,254
- Liked Posts:
- 52,192
He's not going to stop. I think he's doing this trying to get people banned for not talking football. It's like, be really bad at talking football, make no sense, make ridiculous posts about OL play that he doesn't understand, wait for insult and then report posts.
Bears football!
Brownie
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,519
- Liked Posts:
- 3,147
Canth
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 23, 2016
- Posts:
- 4,172
- Liked Posts:
- 5,806
My recollection is that during the hiring cycle where the Bears hired him, he was considered a strong candidate for Jacksonville.
Discus fish salesman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 31, 2018
- Posts:
- 15,842
- Liked Posts:
- 20,542
On a wr screen to the opposite side of the field there is 0 reason to account for backside defensive lineman. The ball comes out immediately or else the qb should be throwing it away. Those lineman have 0 chance of getting to the wr unless he cuts it back to the middle of the field. Not sure why this is being discussed still
- Joined:
- Jan 4, 2011
- Posts:
- 47,822
- Liked Posts:
- 36,711
- Location:
- Chicago
Is that twat seriously still octupling down on their shit opinion of the offensive line on the TD off a screen?
She is worse than Biff in being unable to admit that she is wrong. She also lied in the original thread about watching Fields's press conference, and backpedaled at 1 mph after someone corrected her about her criticizing Carter's performance on that play
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,372
- Liked Posts:
- 3,226
Maybe he’s so fucking lost because a Bears offensive play actually worked as it was designed to? Probably giving him too much credit though.
- Joined:
- Nov 29, 2014
- Posts:
- 17,061
- Liked Posts:
- 17,551
- Location:
- Texas
not once but twice! Back to back series! Resulting in touchdowns! Holy shit where’s the Tylenol!
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 46,249
- Liked Posts:
- 35,478
My favorite teams
Name names, coward.
dbldrew
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 24, 2012
- Posts:
- 6,147
- Liked Posts:
- 2,578
The NFL said that..
NFL practice squads, explained: How it works, rules, eligibility, more
Teams are starting to set up their practice squads on Wednesday.
www.patspulpit.com
What is poaching?
The NFL allows practice squad players to be signed by other teams, but there are some rules governing the process:- Players cannot be signed directly from one practice squad to another. They either have to be released first or added to the active 53-man team.
- Practice squad players are not allowed to sign with upcoming opponents, unless done so a minimum of six days before the two teams’ game (10 if the team is on a bye).
- If a practice squad player is signed by another team, he receives a guaranteed three-week salary and will count against the 53-man roster for at least three weeks — even if released before those three weeks are over.
Bearly
Guest
Have shovel, will travel to mom’s basement. Facts don’t change the fact that you’re utterly confused and off on some tangent about something that I didn’t even imply.The NFL said that..
NFL practice squads, explained: How it works, rules, eligibility, more
Teams are starting to set up their practice squads on Wednesday.What is poaching?
The NFL allows practice squad players to be signed by other teams, but there are some rules governing the process:
- Players cannot be signed directly from one practice squad to another. They either have to be released first or added to the active 53-man team.
- Practice squad players are not allowed to sign with upcoming opponents, unless done so a minimum of six days before the two teams’ game (10 if the team is on a bye).
- If a practice squad player is signed by another team, he receives a guaranteed three-week salary and will count against the 53-man roster for at least three weeks — even if released before those three weeks are over.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined:
- Jan 11, 2014
- Posts:
- 6,923
- Liked Posts:
- 4,327
- Location:
- Chicago
Do the Bears have the #1 wavier spot all year or only until the use it and then the go to the bottom of the list? Thanks!
dennehy
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 29, 2015
- Posts:
- 11,645
- Liked Posts:
- 12,671
- Location:
- Jewels to get a case of Squirt
All year.
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,804
- Liked Posts:
- 2,260
- Location:
- Austin
It's not like fantasy football. They have #1 waiver priority through the 3rd week of the season no matter how many they claim until then.
Moses Moreno
they're gunna mess this up
- Joined:
- Jan 20, 2023
- Posts:
- 2,922
- Liked Posts:
- 3,551
They have it until week 3.
Bearly
Guest
But that's not what we were talking about. You were posting about the bear being 1st in line to claim someone they also cut which is goofy. The rest that you're quoting is only corroborating what you've been previously told by others and they would be last in line for someone they obviously cut for a reason anyway.
Last edited by a moderator:
dbldrew
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 24, 2012
- Posts:
- 6,147
- Liked Posts:
- 2,578
no we where talking about the emergency QB but that cant come from the PS it has to come from the 53, we got side tracked on when and how players end up on the PS, they "originally" have to be waived from the team before ending up on the PS when they cut down to the 53 roster.
But that really has nothing to do with the emergency QB because again the emergency QB has to be on the 53
Bearly
Guest
No we were talking about waiving on the 53 cut down if he doesn't show too much and putting him on the PS. You then said we could just claim him 1st which is both silly since it doesn't help the 53 thing and we couldn't anyway.
Once on the PS, If another team wanted him, outside of 4 protected, he could be signed to any 53 anyway without being waived or us being able to stop it outside of a FA type preference to stay here with a similar offer. Other than the 4 protected players per team, you can sign any player from any practice squad at any time. They don't have to be waived to get filched or brought up on game day but would have to be waived to get back to the PS.
dbldrew
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 24, 2012
- Posts:
- 6,147
- Liked Posts:
- 2,578
I asked if we could claim him first, but as you pointed out you cant claim the guy you just cut. Was thinking there might be a loop hole to bounce him and other players from PS to 53 and back again by cutting then getting first dibs again, but to claim him he has to go back to the 53 not the PS so no loophole.
although there is some new rule that you can bounce a player from PS to the 53 and then back again, but there is limitations on only doing it a few times or something. Bottom line here is the only way to have the emergency QB is to have him on the 53.. if you are putting Bagnet on the PS then your not running a emergency QB because I dont see them keeping both peterson and PJ and have Bagent on the PS
JoJoBoxer
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 12,401
- Liked Posts:
- 7,603
I believe there is a rule, but, even if there weren't a rule, if the Bears pick up a player they cut, off of wavers, he is on the 53 man roster, not the PS. So you might as well keep him on the 53 man roster if you plan on cutting him and bringing him back off of wavers. The PS is for players who went through wavers and did not get signed.