- Joined:
- Sep 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 6,885
- Liked Posts:
- 5,656
- Location:
- Semi-Nomadic
My favorite teams
He was calling you arrogant, not that what you were saying is arrogant. I don't know about PFF stats - how do they grade someone vs the run? I recall Dexter playing well for a rookie last year in both pass and run defense.There's nothing arrogant about stating facts. I laid out clear facts.
1) Dexter struggled against the run last year, his PFF run grade was like 32.8. A 1-technique is primarily a run stopping DT.
2) His best games came when he lined up wider than a 3-technique or outright lined up as a defensive end.
3) Length wins better on the edge than it does inside.
4) He struggled with leverage last year because he is very tall for a DT
5)Dexter lost weight during the off-season which doesn't mesh well with the idea that he'll be a 1-technique
6) Does it fucking matter where he has success at? If he's a pass rushing DT that puts Sweat and others out towards a wide-9 set and they have more room to run stunts and more variable pass rushing schemes to get pressure up front that's overall a good thing to the Chicago Bears defense. I'd rather have him using his athleticism versus lining up as a 1-technique.
There are lots of big men who have succeeded on the inside - Marcus Stroud and Big John Henderson would often switch spots before the snap, and bully the inside as mammoths. I didn't know you felt that a 1 tech was such a limited role - they are often key players for stunts, and someone of his size is a bigger (no pun intended) threat to knock a pass. Pressure from the A gap from a DT leads to interceptions and misfires all the time. In fact, that is where a lot of his highlights from last year came from.
His struggles looked to me to be natural for what he was working on last offseason - in college, he was asked to be the last out of his stance and read-and-react to the play, and last year he was working on shooting out of his stance. He too often was shooting "up" instead of "out" last year. I think this is the essence of why I foresee looking for a stud 3 tech is going to be one of Poles next moves (next year).
Maybe I do not envision someone who succeeds as a 1 tech to be as limited a role as you do. I happen to agree that if he succeeds at 3 that it would be awesome. As for your point 6 - if it is true that it doesnt matter where he succeeds, then what is with the aggression?
---
@knoxville7 Remember when I mentioned to you that I was keeping an eye out for Walter Nolan? Can you imagine a prospect like that next to Dexter?