FedEx227
New member
- Joined:
- Apr 19, 2010
- Posts:
- 508
- Liked Posts:
- 148
- Location:
- Downers Grove, IL
Honestly, I would. They are apparently open to lots of talk show format stuff. Get on that, couldn't hurt.
Although the White Sox HD station could start immediately and can be programmed 24 hours a day, seven days a week if the team desires. A launch date will be announced later. Boyer spoke of how the talk-show format would be the easiest way for the team to go, although syndicated shows would have not had the specific focus designed for this particular focused programming.
FedEx has the credentials, so he's not the worry, it's me. I've looked in to broadcasting school, the problem is money, as usual.
FedEx has the credentials, so he's not the worry, it's me. I've looked in to broadcasting school, the problem is money, as usual.
Fed went to broadcasting school?
Wasn't one of you in law school or looking into it?
how old are you? do you have any income?
student loan shouldnt be too bad for a school like that.
Fed went to broadcasting school?
Wasn't one of you in law school or looking into it?
Your tongue is so far up Dan Bernstein's ass that you are slurping the acid in his stomach.
LOL at "perhaps" mis-judging the situation. First misjudge is one word...no need for the hyphen. Second, no need for the "perhaps". It is impossible for Bernstein to say that the Bears would hold the head-to-head tiebreaker over the Packers...BECAUSE THEY STILL HAVE ANOTHER GAME AGAINST EACH OTHER.
Bernstein gave his typical cursory, half-ass effort at talking actual football. He should stick to bitching about NFL suspensions and who said what about the Bears on TV.
No broadcasting school for me. I just graduated with a Communication Arts degree, but I focused mainly in video editing, TV production, journalism and web/graphic design.
I wouldn't say I have credentials in radio. I've taken a few broadcasting classes in both TV and radio, but I was behind the scene/production for the most part.
I'm the opposite. I got a Mass Comms degree and did basically litle to no behind the scenes work while in school and right after. All my effort and hours went into in front of the camera or behind the mic work.
It's nearly impossible to find jobs in radio though now. So many of the entry level positions that guys got 20-30 years ago aren't around anymore as you are dealing with pre-recorded shows during the gravyard shifts and syndication everywhere.
Boers & Bernstein have become unlistenable. Boers has been out (thankfully), so they had Rozner filling in for awhile. But recently Lawrence Holmes has been co-hosting with Bernstein, and the talk has focused almost exclusively on the NFL. It makes you realize how little Bernstein actually knows about football when he has to talk in-depth about something.
For instance, yesterday a caller said that the Bears are still in a tenuous position for making the postseason, and Bernstein blasted the caller for no reason. After hanging up on the caller, Bernstein then tells us that even if the Bears end up with the same record as the Packers, the Bears would win the NFC North because "they beat the Packers head-to-head".
I've always wondered if there was anything going on in Bernstein's head besides self-aggrandizing, and I see there still isn't anything.
A sad state of affairs for Chicago talk radio.
I never said it was unacceptable, only unnecessary. I am right. But thanks for your input.
I'm not "stretching" when I'm giving specific examples, and its not an "inconsistency in logic" when Bernstein says that the Bears would hold the head-to-head tiebreaker over the Packers...its simply wrong. Which was what I said. I am right. But thanks for your input.
I said its unnecessary. You didn't need to hyphenate misjudge. I know you have difficulty understanding words (such as "fabricate"), but do you honestly not know what "unnecessary" means??
So this statement is "right"..."If the Bears make the playoffs, they will win the Super Bowl". How can that statement be "wrong"? The Bears haven't played a postseason game yet. The statement can't be "wrong"!!!