TL1961
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2013
- Posts:
- 34,856
- Liked Posts:
- 19,019
A Las Vegas sportsbook has Harper as the favorite for NL MVP.
I think it is a over view of a flaw vs a finger point. The Cubs have made him the highest paid at every venture and now have a guideline with Arenado base a extension off of.
The main reason why he wouldn't would be akin to Trout. Shit team not in the play offs with bad contracts and a shit farm. No reason to stay then.
Cubs can go 200M per year. I really don't see a huge issue giving him a quality team to play on.
I can see them locking up Baez, Hendricks and Bryant. Rizzo depends if he rebounds. I'm not sure if they will lock up 1B long term with Bryant potentially taking it over in his 30's.
I would like to see the Cubs and Bryant come together on something like a 8/252 extension past this season. Pay it out at 18/24/30/36/36/36/36/36. The AAV would be 31.5M, which in line with what Arenado got. It would take him through his age 35 season.
Still think he ends up a cub
Not sure what they do. They have 3 years of control. Col had less.
The Cubs could see what they'd get from Tampa for Zobrist and if SFG would take Heyward and 50M for whatever prospect they could get and that would free up enough to make a legit offer on Harper.
Zobrist was late to report to Spring Training for personal reasons and now JayHey is scratched from the lineup for personal reasons for an undisclosed amount of time. I am not a conspiracy theorist, but there may be some merit to your post Castor. SFG may be prolonging the Harper debacle to make a play for JayHey on the cheap (for them), and in return the Cubbies make a last second play for Harper if they can move both Zobrist and Heyward. Usually where there is smoke, there is fire...
If this is the case (and it is purely speculation on my part), Theo better hope the deal goes through, because IF that is the plan and it falls through, Zobrist and JayHey will be shells of themselves (ie: LA Lakers) entering into a season knowing they were on the trade block at this point entering the season IMO.
I will continue to keep my tinfoil hat on and wait to see how this plays out.
GO CUBS GO!
I don't envision Harper in Cubbie blue, but there was a rumor of Zobrist back to Tampa earlier this year and Heyward has got to know that Cubs would like to unload him. Even if the Cubs ate 10M per years remaining on Heyward's deal, if they also unloaded Zobrist, it would take them below the 206M threshold so they could certainly afford to add it back plus some. Would it be best for the Cubs? Only a title in two years would say so. But you put out some combo of Bryant, Harper, Baez, and Rizzo for the nest couple of seasons and you've got a lineup that can match up to most. Schwarber, Contereas, and Almora develop to .270+/.340+/.475+ and it gets down right scary.
The Cubs could see what they'd get from Tampa for Zobrist and if SFG would take Heyward and 50M for whatever prospect they could get and that would free up enough to make a legit offer on Harper.
San Fran won’t do that deal while Harper is unsigned, and Cubs can’t likely sign Harper until that deal is done.
We’re discussing how to squeeze enough $ for Harper and giving away $50M?
Lose Heyward’s D, add Harper’s offense and terrible D, lose Zobrist, and commit to millions.....what’s the upside?
Harper would truly need to be MVP.
But we would be Harper, Almora, Schwarber in OF? Ouch!
You can’t hit enough to make up for awful D.
Would be a fairly petty reason to avoid negotiating with a team. I'm sure it pisses him off but that's the business and there are literally dozens of examples of the other MLB teams doing the same thing to top 5 prospects.
San Fran won’t do that deal while Harper is unsigned, and Cubs can’t likely sign Harper until that deal is done.
We’re discussing how to squeeze enough $ for Harper and giving away $50M?
Lose Heyward’s D, add Harper’s offense and terrible D, lose Zobrist, and commit to millions.....what’s the upside?
Harper would truly need to be MVP.
But we would be Harper, Almora, Schwarber in OF? Ouch!
You can’t hit enough to make up for awful D.
Or Harper can straight up tell them he's not interested in going to them. And while it's very risky, there's nothing stopping the Cubs from signing Harper and then trading Heyward.
According to the numbers Heyward's D slipped last year. With the subjective nature of measuring D, I'll personally take the offensive production.
SB??? Who Heyward???Rarely for a RF the D outweighs the O. CHC being a smaller outfield with no foul ground even less.
His value going on was his D and his SB with 2B power. Sure for a CF that is great. For a RF it is less valued.
The only park that would see extra value out of that make up is SFG. Wrigg his value goes into the stands on either side.
It's not the business part that upsets him. It's that they lied directly to him. They told him what to do to make the club out of ST during the off season. He did it and they still sent him down.
I wouldn't call that petty at all. It means that the Cubs if they want him will have to pay for their mistreatment of Kris.
SB??? Who Heyward???
Heyward is mainly all D and occasionally walks..
He a semi streaky hitter