Shakes
Iconoclast
- Joined:
- Apr 22, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,857
- Liked Posts:
- 142
I like Jermaine O'Neal shooting 6/34 so far. Good to see he hasn't forgotten how to under perform in the playoffs.
pinkizdead wrote:
if we win one more game, we're looking really good in free agency. If we take cleveland to a game 7, we're gonna be really really good in free agency.
Seriously, this again? When are people going to stop thinking that we have to be amazing in the playoffs to attract anyone?
Money is the biggest attraction to any FA & guess what? THE BULLS HAVE MONEY THIS OFFSEASON. I'm saying this for the last time & I'm not even debating about it anymore. Our playoff success this year has ZERO, that's right, ZERO effect on free agency this offseason.
I hate to break it to you but a lot of teams have money. And those that don't can offer better assests and pay more than we can straight up. Its not like we are the only team with money. You don't need cap space to be a player.
I hate to break it to you but a lot of teams have money. And those that don't can offer better assests and pay more than we can straight up. Its not like we are the only team with money. You don't need cap space to be a player.
Neither do you need the playoffs. I still don't understand how getting to the playoffs and getting utterly dominated by a far superior team is good for business when it comes to free agents. Makes no sense to me whatsoever. Unless you can prove to me that FAs have said such a thing, I don't believe it to be true.
I'll make it simple. You have guys who publicly said they wanted to win. Why would you assume they go to a non playoff team then? If what you say is true, there should be lines in NY and NJ. Especially considering a guy like Bosh was frustrated by not getting into the playoffs and Wade looks pissed he is getting knocked out in the first round again. Why wouldn't they go to a proven product? Or at least favor it? I'm not saying it is the only consideration but ever little bit helps. To the contrary, do you think missing the playoffs would make us more attractive to fas?
Diddy1122 wrote:
pinkizdead wrote:
if we win one more game, we're looking really good in free agency. If we take cleveland to a game 7, we're gonna be really really good in free agency.
Seriously, this again? When are people going to stop thinking that we have to be amazing in the playoffs to attract anyone?
Money is the biggest attraction to any FA & guess what? THE BULLS HAVE MONEY THIS OFFSEASON. I'm saying this for the last time & I'm not even debating about it anymore. Our playoff success this year has ZERO, that's right, ZERO effect on free agency this offseason.
I hate to break it to you but a lot of teams have money. And those that don't can offer better assests and pay more than we can straight up. Its not like we are the only team with money. You don't need cap space to be a player.
TheStig wrote:
Diddy1122 wrote:
pinkizdead wrote:
if we win one more game, we're looking really good in free agency. If we take cleveland to a game 7, we're gonna be really really good in free agency.
Seriously, this again? When are people going to stop thinking that we have to be amazing in the playoffs to attract anyone?
Money is the biggest attraction to any FA & guess what? THE BULLS HAVE MONEY THIS OFFSEASON. I'm saying this for the last time & I'm not even debating about it anymore. Our playoff success this year has ZERO, that's right, ZERO effect on free agency this offseason.
I hate to break it to you but a lot of teams have money. And those that don't can offer better assests and pay more than we can straight up. Its not like we are the only team with money. You don't need cap space to be a player.
Two names: Tracy McGrady & Grant Hill. 2 of the top 3 FA's in 2000 signed with Orlando, a team that MISSED THE PLAYOFFS the previous season.
I rest my case.
I'll make it simple. You have guys who publicly said they wanted to win. Why would you assume they go to a non playoff team then? If what you say is true, there should be lines in NY and NJ. Especially considering a guy like Bosh was frustrated by not getting into the playoffs and Wade looks pissed he is getting knocked out in the first round again. Why wouldn't they go to a proven product? Or at least favor it? I'm not saying it is the only consideration but ever little bit helps. To the contrary, do you think missing the playoffs would make us more attractive to fas?
Bosh is the REASON the Raptors are not in the playoffs so why would he care? My problem with your theory is you seem to think Bosh and Wade are stupid. Wrong! They are business men first, and this is strictly business. So according to you, New York is not a player this summer? Says who? Its friggin' New York!
No missing the playoffs does not make the team more attractive to FAs, but only because the playoffs don't matter in the grand scheme of things. If it did matter, they would all be at the door of the Oklahoma Thunder...believe that...that is the team to watch for in the near future among teams with cap space.
Diddy1122 wrote:
TheStig wrote:
Diddy1122 wrote:
pinkizdead wrote:
if we win one more game, we're looking really good in free agency. If we take cleveland to a game 7, we're gonna be really really good in free agency.
Seriously, this again? When are people going to stop thinking that we have to be amazing in the playoffs to attract anyone?
Money is the biggest attraction to any FA & guess what? THE BULLS HAVE MONEY THIS OFFSEASON. I'm saying this for the last time & I'm not even debating about it anymore. Our playoff success this year has ZERO, that's right, ZERO effect on free agency this offseason.
I hate to break it to you but a lot of teams have money. And those that don't can offer better assests and pay more than we can straight up. Its not like we are the only team with money. You don't need cap space to be a player.
Two names: Tracy McGrady & Grant Hill. 2 of the top 3 FA's in 2000 signed with Orlando, a team that MISSED THE PLAYOFFS the previous season.
I rest my case.
Yeah two max fas, last time I checked we couldn't do that. We don't have that option and if they want to team up, it can't happen here.
TheStig wrote:
Diddy1122 wrote:
TheStig wrote:
Diddy1122 wrote:
pinkizdead wrote:
if we win one more game, we're looking really good in free agency. If we take cleveland to a game 7, we're gonna be really really good in free agency.
Seriously, this again? When are people going to stop thinking that we have to be amazing in the playoffs to attract anyone?
Money is the biggest attraction to any FA & guess what? THE BULLS HAVE MONEY THIS OFFSEASON. I'm saying this for the last time & I'm not even debating about it anymore. Our playoff success this year has ZERO, that's right, ZERO effect on free agency this offseason.
I hate to break it to you but a lot of teams have money. And those that don't can offer better assests and pay more than we can straight up. Its not like we are the only team with money. You don't need cap space to be a player.
Two names: Tracy McGrady & Grant Hill. 2 of the top 3 FA's in 2000 signed with Orlando, a team that MISSED THE PLAYOFFS the previous season.
I rest my case.
Yeah two max fas, last time I checked we couldn't do that. We don't have that option and if they want to team up, it can't happen here.
Boy did you ever miss the point on that one.
Its a whole different ball game. They got two guys. We don't have a chance at that, therefore we have to sell what we have already much harder. If what we have can't make the playoffs, why come here?
TheStig wrote:
Diddy1122 wrote:
pinkizdead wrote:
if we win one more game, we're looking really good in free agency. If we take cleveland to a game 7, we're gonna be really really good in free agency.
Two names: Tracy McGrady & Grant Hill. 2 of the top 3 FA's in 2000 signed with Orlando, a team that MISSED THE PLAYOFFS the previous season.
I rest my case.
so what you're saying is that we have to move to orlando?
Diddy1122 wrote:
TheStig wrote:
Diddy1122 wrote:
pinkizdead wrote:
if we win one more game, we're looking really good in free agency. If we take cleveland to a game 7, we're gonna be really really good in free agency.
Two names: Tracy McGrady & Grant Hill. 2 of the top 3 FA's in 2000 signed with Orlando, a team that MISSED THE PLAYOFFS the previous season.
I rest my case.
so what you're saying is that we have to move to orlando?
:laugh: I'd rather move to Cali. Too many old folks down in FLA.
Its a whole different ball game. They got two guys. We don't have a chance at that, therefore we have to sell what we have already much harder. If what we have can't make the playoffs, why come here?
If "stars like to play with stars" like you initially said, though you change your arguments with the weather...why would Bosh give a damn about the playoffs? Rose is already a star...you think Bosh would look at Miami and say...don't want to play with Dwyane, because the Heat missed the playoffs? I don't think so...its either one or the other...
You are accusing those FA's of stupidity. Potential is what does players would value over whether a team makes the playoffs. If OKC didn't make the playoffs, would they be a less desirable destination? I don't think so...Durant is still Durant...
Right, the potential is greater elsewhere. Look at NY, they can team up there and then get another above average player the next year or team up in NJ with an established PG and C. We don't offer the most potential. If you add Bron and Bosh to Harris and Lopez, they have a lot more potential then Rose, Deng, Noah and Bosh. My point is you keep saying how we have some sort of distinct competive advantage that we don't have. If we don't have a competive advantage and miss the playoffs, I don't think anyone looks at us seriously. Now we are an up and coming team that on its own can make the playoffs. Thats something. We might be very advantagous overall but in every single aspect, there is a team that can offer something more, hopefully our collective product can sell us.
Wow how about the Bucks, came back from 9 down in the last to win the game in Atlanta. Skiles was absolutely robbed of coach of the year.
Right, the potential is greater elsewhere. Look at NY, they can team up there and then get another above average player the next year or team up in NJ with an established PG and C. We don't offer the most potential. If you add Bron and Bosh to Harris and Lopez, they have a lot more potential then Rose, Deng, Noah and Bosh. My point is you keep saying how we have some sort of distinct competive advantage that we don't have. If we don't have a competive advantage and miss the playoffs, I don't think anyone looks at us seriously. Now we are an up and coming team that on its own can make the playoffs. Thats something. We might be very advantagous overall but in every single aspect, there is a team that can offer something more, hopefully our collective product can sell us.
Its hypocritical of you to accentuate the importance of the playoffs but then speak of how NJ is a worthy destination, even more so than Chicago, based on the potential of Devin Harris and Brook Lopez. If that is the case, why would a Bosh go to NJ ahead of Chicago, if Lebron and Wade stay where they are? At this point, Rose and Noah could be more of an attraction to free agents than Harris and Lopez...