Potential Bulls Head Coaching Candidates

DCguy

Active member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2010
Posts:
1,791
Liked Posts:
262
Location:
Washington, DC
So you think Rose played well in the 2nd and 3rd quarter against Dellavedova?

I am saying Rose played well altogether. Did he play great in every quarter? No, but no one has. That's what I am saying.
 

Rustysurf83

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 22, 2010
Posts:
1,244
Liked Posts:
694
Location:
PNW
He's a former MVP who is making $95 million. Matthew Dellavadova doesn't get to play like that against him.

Thank you. Thank fucking God, another person will hold a former MVP accountable for his performance against a scrub from St. Mary's.
 

DCguy

Active member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2010
Posts:
1,791
Liked Posts:
262
Location:
Washington, DC
He's a former MVP who is making $95 million. Matthew Dellavadova doesn't get to play like that against him.

Salary doesn't have anything to do with that. For the most part he fried that guy. Let's be realistic here.
 

Rustysurf83

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 22, 2010
Posts:
1,244
Liked Posts:
694
Location:
PNW
I am saying Rose played well altogether. Did he play great in every quarter? No, but no one has. That's what I am saying.

I will say this. Rose's performance is the reason that Thibs will be the sacrificial lamb. Rose is by far the bigger problem when compared to Thibs; Thibs is just far easier to get rid of.
 

DCguy

Active member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2010
Posts:
1,791
Liked Posts:
262
Location:
Washington, DC
So if a player makes certain amount of money, and a player who makes less than him gets a good play or a quarter or two on him, that's a crime. Hilarious.
 

DCguy

Active member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2010
Posts:
1,791
Liked Posts:
262
Location:
Washington, DC
Are you for real?

I am. Sadly so are you. Money has nothing to do with it. No one brought that up when Kawahi Leonard gave it to LeBron in the Finals. He played well. No need to bring up money. Money has nothing to do with it. Makes no sense to put that in the equation.
 

Rustysurf83

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 22, 2010
Posts:
1,244
Liked Posts:
694
Location:
PNW
I am. Sadly so are you. Money has nothing to do with it. No one brought that up when Kawahi Leonard gave it to LeBron in the Finals. He played well. No need to bring up money. Money has nothing to do with it. Makes no sense to put that in the equation.

It has everything to do with money as the NBA is a capped league. Our former MVP, max level PG, got outplayed by an undrafted guy making 800K...You don't think that is a big deal? Rose's deal also significantly handicaps the Bulls next season since they have to max Jimmy.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
46,582
Liked Posts:
35,825
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
So if a player makes certain amount of money, and a player who makes less than him gets a good play or a quarter or two on him, that's a crime. Hilarious.
You just don't get. When I hear DRose has said things in the past like, 'This is my city,' 'I die for this game,' and all of the other hyperbolic shit that this guy has said, then he goes out in an elimination game, in 'his city' and he let Matthew Dellavadova outplay him it is wholly unacceptable. That he is a former MVP and takes up that much of the Bulls payroll makes his play in Game 6 unacceptable.

If you can't see that, you're just a dope. Then again, you are the guy that said James Worthy was a better finisher at the hoop than Lebron James.
 

DCguy

Active member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2010
Posts:
1,791
Liked Posts:
262
Location:
Washington, DC
It has everything to do with money as the NBA is a capped league. Our former MVP, max level PG, got outplayed by an undrafted guy making 800K...You don't think that is a big deal? Rose's deal also significantly handicaps the Bulls next season since they have to max Jimmy.

One It has NOTHING to do with money. That is a flawed logic. I am not one of those fans who are in athletes pockets. So to me that is not even in the equation. Two, Rose was not outplayed by anyone in that series.

Every thing you stated has nothing to do with anything. Rose getting, in your words, outplayed, has to do with money is comical to me. But to each their own.
 

Rustysurf83

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 22, 2010
Posts:
1,244
Liked Posts:
694
Location:
PNW
One It has NOTHING to do with money. That is a flawed logic. I am not one of those fans who are in athletes pockets. So to me that is not even in the equation. Two, Rose was not outplayed by anyone in that series.

Every thing you stated has nothing to do with anything. Rose getting, in your words, outplayed, has to do with money is comical to me. But to each their own.

So..you believe that Rose performed up to the level expected of a max player in this series?
 

DCguy

Active member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2010
Posts:
1,791
Liked Posts:
262
Location:
Washington, DC
You just don't get. When I hear DRose has said things in the past like, 'This is my city,' 'I die for this game,' and all of the other hyperbolic shit that this guy has said, then he goes out in an elimination game, in 'his city' and he let Matthew Dellavadova outplay him it is wholly unacceptable. That he is a former MVP and takes up that much of the Bulls payroll makes his play in Game 6 unacceptable.

If you can't see that, you're just a dope. Then again, you are the guy that said James Worthy was a better finisher at the hoop than Lebron James.

I get it. I just disagree with you. Then again, when someone disagrees with you, you resort to name calliing. There is nothing to see. I disagree with you. The sooner you get that the sooner the better. I can care less what you think. You are just some dude on a messageboard
 

Rustysurf83

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 22, 2010
Posts:
1,244
Liked Posts:
694
Location:
PNW
I get it. I just disagree with you. Then again, when someone disagrees with you, you resort to name calliing. There is nothing to see. I disagree with you. The sooner you get that the sooner the better. I can care less what you think. You are just some dude on a messageboard

I doubt Webster or Oxford has a better definition of dumb than the post above...
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
46,582
Liked Posts:
35,825
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
Dellavedova: 19 points on 7-11 shooting in 34 minutes
Rose: 14 points on 7-16 shooting in 35 minutes

Thankfully, he was 'distributing' the ball, with his 6 assists.....
 

JimJohnson

Well-known member
Joined:
May 31, 2014
Posts:
5,190
Liked Posts:
913
Everyone is to blame when there is inconsistencies. The coach wasn't pushing the right buttons and the players weren't as ready as they should have been. The reshuffling should happen especially on the bench. No one outside of Taj provided anything, they gave up leads just about every game the Bulls played in the playoffs. That to me was the real demise of the team.

Thibs hasn't pushed the right buttons in 5 years. On top of that, the players don't really care for him. Why do you want to retain him?

So you think a reshuffling of the Bulls Bench = 2016 Title?
 

Only me

New member
Joined:
May 8, 2015
Posts:
32
Liked Posts:
3
Thibs is a good coach but he has a glass ceiling he can't break and that is why we need to look for someone else.
Coach showed us that he can run players into the ground and produce a killer defense at times but...Defense will only take you so far and will not get you a ring.
I agree Talent wise we were always a bit short ,but a Very good coach could have done much better with the cards at his disposal. (we should have won this series for sure).
Thibs didn't evolve in all the years i've watched him so their is no reason to expect he will.

Can we get anyone better that's a great question.
 

RonnieTheBull

New member
Joined:
May 3, 2015
Posts:
12
Liked Posts:
1
Location:
India
Thibs didn't utilize the bench players as he should have . I can't remember him giving McDermott or Snell a good chance on the floor all season long ; neither did we see Bairstow or too much of Brooks either . Doug should have been given more minutes , period . He may not have lived up to his hype , but hey , he IS a Rookie . This is a Big boy league , he ain't in college now .
So , in the new season , I want Snell and Doug getting more minutes ; and let's hope for the best .
 

Top