- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 60,828
- Liked Posts:
- 39,199
But why do that if you're in a win now mode after signing Brees? Get him a playmaker! Larry's about to have a behind the scenes coming on.
Part of win now is having some semblance of cap space for emergencies. The Warford cut created 80% of their current cap space.
Bro, you don't even watch the bears. How the fuck you watching Seattle tape?
I watched enough tape to know he played RT in 2017 not RG like you asserted. Maybe next time you watch tape, focus on the positions the players are actually playing.
Why would anyone (You) want us to give Warford at least $7+ mil if that person (You) had any faith in Ifedi who we have on a much cheaper deal and then we could use that $7+ mil on other needed additions like RB or Edge or T or replacing Nick Williams who was really good replacing A.Hicks when he got hurt? Just seems odd. I don't think any person on here has 100% faith that Ifedi is gonna be just fine but we understand that he could and that we also have Bars who we don't if he could fill that RG spot either yet.
Great if there is a RB, Edge or T out there worth the 7 million then let me know. Otherwise this hypothetical really has no bearing on anything.
It is really weird to say we should not sign a guy who would easily be the best OL on the team so that we can spend 7 million a year on a back up RB, back-up pass rusher, back-up DT, etc. In what NFL reality do you live in where teams routinely pay 7 million for backups? Or are you saying you think this RB, Edge, or DT is going to supplant the starters?
You didn't really think this through did you?