<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Ton DeFrancesco" data-cid="200428" data-time="1371014950">
<div>
I thought I was the only fancy one around here.</p>
</p>
Seriously though... the whole Stalberg vs. Bollig thing, let's get real here.</p>
</p>
How many fights have the Blackhawks had in the 2013 playoffs? Hell, combine the Bruins in that.</p>
</p>
The answer is one, between both teams. But yeah, sure... we need someone to scrap now, all of the sudden, just because we are facing another team who has fought once in the entire playoffs. Pretty logical when you look at it that way, eh?</p>
</p>
I'd rather have someone who can play hockey in the line-up, than someone who most-likely won't be on the ice when Sharp, Toews, Kane, or Hossa are out there getting beat up. That's why you have someone like Bickell on those lines. Or Shaw.</p>
You want to have a guy willing to stick up for teammates on every line? Put Shaw up there, there's a million combinations that are better than Bollig.</p>
</p>
Bickell/Toews/Kane</p>
Shaw/<u>
Sharp</u>/Hossa</p>
</p>
Use your imagination for the bottom two lines with Zeus, Bolland, Kruger, Frolik, Saad, and Stalberg filling them out. Does anyone really think Boston is dumb enough to scrap with Bollig, when they know that he's only dressed to fulfill that purpose? I hope that Q was just messing around because this idea is fucking Special person. "Yeah, let's change up the roster... ya know, that one that made it all the way to the SCF!"</p>
</p>
***** about Stalberg's one goal in 28 playoff games, but Toews not hitting the scoresheet is OK.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</p>
This ^ post. So. Much. Fucking. WORD.</p>
</p>
</p>
Also? If I had a nut, I would most certainly give it to finally, FINALLY just have Sharp back centering---2C problems at least temporarily SOLVED like a *****! Presto! Now would be ideal too. . .ya know, for old time-y Cup-winning memories sake, heh. </p>
