You obviously never did. Your posts made that clear.
Still not getting it. Your inability to track and follow conversdations or even understand what the hell is going on is a joke.
Still can't understand how he isn't getting this.
The fact that 97Bulls is saying that Hill wasn't an above the rim player proves tome that he is either : 13 years old or never watched Hill play before he got hurt. There's no other way to excuse or explain it really.
Outside of posting stats from a few players everything he has said is either factually, logically, or rationally incorrect.
Lol im 37 yrs old. If I was 13, do you really think id be sitting here going back and forth about grant friggn hill?
And I understand your view. I just disagree with it. I've even reiterated your view. You feel pippen was better but hill could've or would've been better had he not missed half his prime due to injuries. I just disagree. You've showed no facts to support this claim. I've shown multiple to support my view. Ive shown you what he did when he did come back, I've shown you that just cuz he score an avg of 26 ppg doesn't mean he could've continued that same consistancy based on other players that scored similar to him.
You refuse to admit that pippen spent his prime behind jordan. Which hindered his statistical production. But somehow 22/9/7 is the best pippen would've ever achieved statistically. But hill would've been better? Your a hater. I ask you about their defense and you play the shits and giggles card? And im the 13 yr old? Come on
And you refuse to acknowledge the clear and dominant advantage pippen has over hill defensively. Am I saying hill was a bad defender? NO!. But they're not on the same level defensively. You even show your hate more when you wont/refuse to say this. Hill never sniffed an all defense selection. I wouldn't even rank hill ahead of eddie jones defensively.
You also must understand you and ramithesocalledbullsfan are comming from seperate points of view. He feels hill was better regardless of prime. Not that pippen was a bad player mind you, but not quite better than hill cuz pippen didn't avg 26 ppg in 94. And he's another that feels hill and pippen are similar defensively. But offensively, hill is clearly superior cuz he (say it with me) avg 26 ppg in 00. Even though throughout the rest of their respective careers, they're offensive output is very similar. With a slight edge to hill. But the fact that hill avg 21 ppg as a number 1 option over 5 years and pippen 20 over 7 as a second option is null and void. Cuz pippen didn't avg 26 ppg in 94. And hill would've scored more ppg if he didn't have to share the ball with jerry stackhouse even though pippen played with an even bigger and more efficient ball hog in jordan.
Now I've summarized your and the ramis point of view. But you guys obviously don't understand mine.
