Hmmm, always a great idea to trade young, successful players for so called "assets".
"The truth is that very few players taken in the NHL draft this weekend will ever play in the NHL. In order to get an accurate read of how many drafted players played at least 200 games in the NHL, a study by proicehockey.about.com looked at the drafts between 1990 and 1999. Of the 2,600 hundred players drafted just 494 or 19% played in at least 200 contests. 63% of first round picks played but less than 25% of second round picks survived and only 12% of third rounder selections. Former NHL general manager Doug MacLean said his math over the last decade showed that only 15% of second round picks ever become impact players."
Or....
"What percentage of players drafted make it to the NHL? On average 49% of players who are drafted by an NHL team will make it to the NHL, which means that they play at least one game at the NHL level."
One game. You can probably take a guess on the percentage of players that work their way through to become stars. Which is why if you have a young one, you keep him.
The chances of building successfully from ground zero is minimal. You need a mix. Keeping some young players that are great or can be great, drafting better than the other guy and clearing Cap space to be able to sign a couple of players that the already successful teams can't resign because they are capped out. You need to be Cap friendly. NO more dumb, over priced long term signings, it can't happen anymore. This is the biggest blunder that Bowman made and given the fact that he had to go through it himself early and often in the 10 year run, makes it absolutely unforgiveable that he would put his own team in that same kind of hole.
This is not MLB with it's 5 year rebuilds. The NHL is a cap league like the NFL and the NBA. A good GM can rebuild in 3 to 4 years if he drafts well, keeps his Cap under control and makes sensible signings. I have no idea if Davidson is that guy....it sure would be nice if he was.