- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 29,727
- Liked Posts:
- 24,285
- Location:
- USA
Ill let you know when I see them play. That is the only way to be sure at this point.
Ricardo Allen, Corey Linsley, AJ McCarron, Devon Kennard, Pat O'Donnel, Zach Fulton, Matt Pradis, Shemar Steven, and TJ Carrie. Out of more than 100 picks in the late rounds of 2014, that's all that's left besides Leno.I honestly have to wonder, how many 5tyh 6th and seven round picks from Leno's draft is still in the NFL besides, well Leno XD?
Everything you just said is wrong congrats you know nothing.
You just named teams with good starting OLs.
Chiefs depth hasn't played together yet. They literally lost the SB because they didn't have good enough OL depth. Probably the deepest OL in the league now because it killed them 3 months ago.
Patriots are the opposite and lost their depth in free agency. Their backups are Ted Karras and some no-name 6th and 7th rounders
Packers depth is because they just spent 3 draft picks on OL. They could have depth, but not proven yet.
Colts depth is Julie'n Davenport and Sam Tevi, both of whom were very bad starting OTs, and 1 of them may start until Eric Fisher gets healthy
Browns signed Chris Hubbard and drafted James Hudson in the 4th. Solid, not spectacular depth assuming Hudson can play
The Chiefs lost the super bowl because they lost both of their starting tackles right before the SB and lost their starting LG in week 5 and STILL made the super bowl but go on and tell me about how they're not deep... and you know, the Bucs defense is pretty good.You just named teams with good starting OLs.
Chiefs depth hasn't played together yet. They literally lost the SB because they didn't have good enough OL depth. Probably the deepest OL in the league now because it killed them 3 months ago.
Patriots are the opposite and lost their depth in free agency. Their backups are Ted Karras and some no-name 6th and 7th rounders
Packers depth is because they just spent 3 draft picks on OL. They could have depth, but not proven yet.
Colts depth is Julie'n Davenport and Sam Tevi, both of whom were very bad starting OTs, and 1 of them may start until Eric Fisher gets healthy
Browns signed Chris Hubbard and drafted James Hudson in the 4th. Solid, not spectacular depth assuming Hudson can play
He kicked the cam down the road for years, as in past tense. He finally HAD to use higher picks on OT because he hasn’t ever prior to this year. His prior “high” OL picks were Whitehair, an OG, and Daniels, a C.He kicked the can down the road by using a 2nd and 5th to address the OL? Explain how that analysis makes sense.
Wait. Wouldn't going from a really good OL to playing 3 replacements and getting destroyed the definition of not having depth? If the replacements were good depth, they wouldn't have suffered from a monumental fall off from starters to depth.The Chiefs lost the super bowl because they lost both of their starting tackles right before the SB and lost their starting LG in week 5 and STILL made the super bowl but go on and tell me about how they're not deep... and you know, the Bucs defense is pretty good.
He kicked the cam down the road for years, as in past tense. He finally HAD to use higher picks on OT because he hasn’t ever prior to this year. His prior “high” OL picks were Whitehair, an OG, and Daniels, a C.
The Raiders and Bills among many other teams also have strong offensive lines. It’s not hard to do if you have a GM that prioritizes it. No other organization would keep a guy like Castillo around, or not draft or pay any significant capital for OL. No other organization would let Alex Bars outside the Kids section.
If only Phil Emery got 7 drafts...Also, what was that OL in 05 and 06? Is this selective memory?Pace has his shortcomings, but he's much better than the last 2 GMs in terms of building an offensive line.
Since Daniels can't seem to play C I'd call that a fail of a pick, especially considering who we didn't get for the center who can't play the position.
Daniels is not a failed pick
He actually hasn't been that good. He is young but mediocre to bad. Bears fans just overrate him because of the former.
Well the depth got them to Super Bowl, try and keep upWait. Wouldn't going from a really good OL to playing 3 replacements and getting destroyed the definition of not having depth? If the replacements were good depth, they wouldn't have suffered from a monumental fall off from starters to depth.
It really isn't that Pace ignored the O line, it is that he ignored the tackle position on the O line, drafting Centers and Guards. And what worries me is that the two O lineman draft picks this year appear to be RT's not LT's...To be fair to Ryan Pace, the Bears have actually drafted a lineman in all but 1 of his 7 drafts, and 10 total. Four of those years he drafted OL in the first 3 rounds. The one draft he didn't draft any OL, he only had 5 picks (none in the first 2 rounds), and managed to add Alex Bars and Sam Mustipher as UDFAs.
So, I don't think you can say Pace has ignored OL. I think the biggest issues have been depth and evaluating OL. Re-signing Massie was a bad idea. He probably stayed with Leno, Long, and Massie for too long and didn't do enough to challenge them for spots. He didn't do enough to get Whitehair at his best position. And keeping Coward on the roster for multiple seasons is indefensiveable.
In the middle of it all is James Daniels. The third-year lineman is paving the way in his return to the left guard spot. Daniels is Pro Football Focus’ 26th-highest-graded guard among 76 qualifiers. The eye test suggests a vast improvement over last year’s uneven showing when he split time between left guard and center. His pass-blocking could use some work, but Daniels’ 73.3 run-blocking grade ranks as the 16th best in the league.
A Beefed-Up James Daniels is Leading an Improved Bears Offensive Line - Bleacher Nation
All five of the Bears' offensive linemen rank in the top-third of their respective position groups!www.bleachernation.com