Go a little farther back than the last half of the year, will you? The fact that Garza other than when with Texas and his rookie year has never been above 4.00 in ERA, and that includes both leagues. You can take the rest of the Cubs staff, put them in the AL and watch their numbers dwindle greatly.
no need to go farther back... you said he was far more superior then what the cubs have now... I beg to differ, cause I believe what he showed in the 2nd half of last year after injury is going to be pretty close to what your going to get from him now..
we cant compare samardzija and wood with Garza in texas but we can with their stint with the cubs and Garza is far from being more superior then them..
he wasn't even "superior" over travis wood in almost the same starts, and wood suppose to be a 4 at best 3..
heck for what it worth, travis wood made the all star team..
Garza 60 GS 21 Wins 3.45 ERA 1.21 WHIP 3.09 K/BB
travis wood 58 GS 15 Wins 3.62 ERA 1.16 WHIP 2.18
Also, if situations were the same, and Garza had two years of control left like Shark, do you think he would have fetched what the Cubs need as far as prospects? I do, and sorry to say, but it is because what he did in his past
he didn't quite fetch much in return from the cubs to the Rays and he had 3 yrs of control left prior to that trade.. they got quantity but not much in quality..
prob. because his
past performances showed he wasn't anything more then a .500 starter with an ERA close to 4.00 and can give you about 6 IP..
Dempster sported really good numbers until he went to the AL. Garza did too until his last stint with the AL, but somehow, the rest of the Cubs staff would do okay in the AL?
I don't recall saying the rest of the cubs staff would be ok in the AL, I never even made that comparison.. you said he would be more superior then what the cubs have now in their rotation.. I disagreed.. I think post injury, he not going to be all that good, and what we saw of him the 2nd half of last year will be pretty close to what he will be like...
And if you think Garza is overrated, then you are over-hyping the rest of this staff.
again, never mention anything about hyping up the rest of staff.. just disagreed that Garza is more superior then samardzija and wood..
if anyone hyping up any player, its you with Garza...
If Garza were on the Cubs today, he would be penciled in at the very least as the number 2 starter, and more than likely number one. There is no debate on that one.
which means nothing to your argument of him being more superior then samardzija and wood..
If you think differently, keep talking.
im not not gonna tell you that samardzija and wood are better pitchers at this stage then Garza, but there is no way you can sit here and say that after the 2013 season and going into 2014, that Garza is a more superior starter the samardzija and wood.. If anything those 3 are about equal going into the season..