Arrieta
21-6
223 IP
1.82 ERA / 2.40 FIP
223 innings - 229 strikeouts
Grienke
18-3
207 IP
1.65 ERA / 2.77 FIP
207.2 IP - 185 SO
Kershaw
15-7
220 IP
2.25 ERA / 2.11 FIP
220 innings - 281 SO
In my book, it's Arrieta than Kershaw if only for this reason:
Kershaw's starts with ER given up by start
0 - 7
1 - 10
2 - 3
3 - 7
4 - 2
5 - 2
Here's Arrieta
0 - 11
1 - 9
2 - 4
3 - 4
4 - 4
The reason I excluded Grienke was the difference in IP and the significant SO advantage the other two have over Grienke. Now you have to exclude somewhere and Jake's dominance in 0/1 ER starts to me is a huge factor.
Swap the uniforms on Greinke and Arrieta and you aren't dropping Greinke. You're simply not being objective.
Jake is right there. It's very close. But dropping Greinke - who has allowed fewer runners per inning and fewer runs per inning, simply based on SO's? Silly.
If a pitcher is getting outs, it doesn't matter how they get them. FIP is too skewed by K's. Kershaw simply has NOT been as good as the other two in preventing runs. (He has that "awful" 2.25 ERA). The fact he has more K's does not mean a thing.
I'd love to see Jake get it, and I think it's possible. But in fairness, I can't give a medal to a guy who finishes second in a race simply because he was running better at the end of the race. Greinke has been under 2.00 every day of the year. If Jake got under greinke's ERA overall, Greinke being under 2.00 all year would not be enough to win it. But if Greinke finishes with a lower WHIP and a lower ERA (which is very likely), how does he not deserve it?