msadows
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 26,216
- Liked Posts:
- 21,271
caleb is one of the worst 1st quarter QB's ive ever had the pleasure of watching in my lifetime.
As opposed to Chicago where they are doing their best to ruin Caleb.They are
He was slightly better because they protected him.....but he still couldn't produce yards/points
I prefer to compare Caleb to this rookie:Caleb:
17 TDs, 5 INTs, 2,937 yards
Three 300 yd games
Remember the last two years when we were upset at the QBs 4th quarter stat line?caleb is one of the worst 1st quarter QB's ive ever had the pleasure of watching in my lifetime.
One does it while the team isn't in prevent for a whole half?And despite one playing in an easy-going, well-coached, efficient offense and the other having to claw and scrape for every yard, they're basically on par with each other.
What does that tell you?
Cool. I guess you can't read the numbers I posted. Any type of efficiency number or advanced metric favors Daniels heavily. 10% higher completion percentage, more yards in 75 fewer attempts, almost 15 points higher in passer rating, 1.5 yards per attempt higher, almost two yards higher in net yards per attempt. The Commanders are 6th in 3rd down % and the Bears are 31st. But I already mentioned that.There are a few who will refuse to admit the obvious.
When I read this, it makes me think how much better Washington’s coaches are, and that I would take Caleb over Daniels long term at the QB position.Cool. I guess you can't read the numbers I posted. Any type of efficiency number or advanced metric favors Daniels heavily. 10% higher completion percentage, more yards in 75 fewer attempts, almost 15 points higher in passer rating, 1.5 yards per attempt higher, almost two yards higher in net yards per attempt. The Commanders are 6th in 3rd down % and the Bears are 31st. But I already mentioned that.
Not saying that Williams is putting up bad numbers, but to think they are comparable to Daniels is ludicrous.
It’s called garbage yards. A lot of this is garbage yards.Aren’t most of Caleb’s stats just from the second half? Imagine when he figures out there is actually 2 halves of football.
I think Washington has better coaches, but IMO Daniels has been much more consistent with not a whole lot of 'weapons' around him. He is just a better passer at this point. Can Caleb become more accurate with a better scheme and better coaches? Perhaps. But sometimes it doesn't work out that way.When I read this, it makes me think how much better Washington’s coaches are, and that I would take Caleb over Daniels long term at the QB position.
I don’t disagree, but it’s much easier to be more consistent and a better passer when you have better coaches and a better OL.I think Washington has better coaches, but IMO Daniels has been much more consistent with not a whole lot of 'weapons' around him. He is just a better passer at this point. Can Caleb become more accurate with a better scheme and better coaches? Perhaps. But sometimes it doesn't work out that way.
You’re absolutely right. Daniels and the Washington offense is much more efficient and performing much better than Williams and the Bears offense.Cool. I guess you can't read the numbers I posted. Any type of efficiency number or advanced metric favors Daniels heavily. 10% higher completion percentage, more yards in 75 fewer attempts, almost 15 points higher in passer rating, 1.5 yards per attempt higher, almost two yards higher in net yards per attempt. The Commanders are 6th in 3rd down % and the Bears are 31st. But I already mentioned that.
Not saying that Williams is putting up bad numbers, but to think they are comparable to Daniels is ludicrous.
If Daniels has Williams’ same stats in a much better, more efficient offense, what do Daniels’ stats look like in the Bears offense?I think Washington has better coaches, but IMO Daniels has been much more consistent with not a whole lot of 'weapons' around him. He is just a better passer at this point. Can Caleb become more accurate with a better scheme and better coaches? Perhaps. But sometimes it doesn't work out that way.
There is no doubt this organization sucks....but it's not like the previous two qb's were all pro level qb's who were ruined by this org.....they also sucked........and their careers moving on from the bears has proven that......if anything the bears are also bad at judging talent at the position and consistently pick the wrong one.As opposed to Chicago where they are doing their best to ruin Caleb.
Face it. Regardless of skill level, this moribund organization has squandered 2 1st round QB's and are trying to it again.
And for the record Fields was much better in Pittsburgh than Chicago. There is a reason for that.
There is no doubt this organization sucks....but it's not like the previous two qb's were all pro level qb's who were ruined by this org.....they also sucked........and their careers moving on from the bears has proven that......if anything the bears are also bad at judging talent at the position and consistently pick the wrong one.
Time will tell with Williams but he looks 100x better than either of the previous two first rounders.
You’re absolutely right. Daniels and the Washington offense is much more efficient and performing much better than Williams and the Bears offense.
And yet…..
Their numbers are almost the exact same.
“Both of these students scored 90 percent in the class. They seem close.”
“NO! YOU FOOL! One student has supportive parents and tutors and shows a command of the subject matter that the other doesn’t.
The other one has abusive parents who don’t feed him, and doesn’t have any sort of competent support system. He had to work harder to get that score—It didn’t come easy.”
“Ok, but they both scored 90 percent…”
“NO! YOU F’ING IDIOT!!”
To be fair, neither of those QB's were watching their team go down 20-0 in every first half then just slinging around garbage yards. This offense/team is worse than that 3 win fields team.
He also makes mitch trubisky look like an elite deep ball passer, since he overthrows guys downfield even more than mitch
Neither of them were also oblivious to pressure like Caleb is.
The last two are the biggest worries since everyone said caleb would be a drastic instant upgrade at both. Dudes sack to pressure ratio is horrible, which points to the QB being responsible for a lot of them. He also is the worst downfield passer in the entire NFL, even mitch wasnt that,
Its clear he has much more arm talent and physical tools than both of those guys combined, but right now if he doesnt fix both of those issues he at best will be a meh NFL QB. My other concern is due to all the sacks he's also now starting to miss open guys and not processing the field as well.
Commanders offense is among the league’s best while Caleb’s offense is among the league’s worst. One of these QB’s stats are not like the other’s. I never thought in a million years that this year’s offense was going to be lower ranked than last year’s.Not sure what stats you are looking at, but OK!
"Cool. I guess you can't read the numbers I posted. Any type of efficiency number or advanced metric favors Daniels heavily. 10% higher completion percentage, more yards in 75 fewer attempts, almost 15 points higher in passer rating, 1.5 yards per attempt higher, almost two yards higher in net yards per attempt. The Commanders are 6th in 3rd down % and the Bears are 31st. But I already mentioned that.
Not saying that Williams is putting up bad numbers, but to think they are comparable to Daniels is ludicrous."