- Joined:
- Nov 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 25,053
- Liked Posts:
- 11,503
My favorite teams
Shut the **** up already.
Make me
Shut the **** up already.
But they didn't have appeal before they had a chance to sign fielder....so your scenario from earlier isn't possible...fact.
You lose again
Is it even possible for someone to be this dumb?
Ok theres a reason the Cubs and five other teams didnt draft Appel last year. You think no one wanted the best pitching prospect available? Come on man use your brain. Learn how the draft works.
There was a high risk of drafting Appel high because there was a good chance he wouldnt sign. Sure enough, the Pirates drafted him at 9, I believe? and yea what happened, he went back to college. So theres a very good chance the cubs wouldnt have been able to sign him. And then they wouldve wasted their #6 pick and everyone would be flaming Theo.
So they took Almora who they knew they could sign. Im really confused why you tried to bring some of you try to bring in not drafting Appel without knowing the facts...
But somehow there is no risk in drafting a high school kid??
There was a lot of talk about Almora not signing and going to college, but the Slurpers conveniently seem to forget that little detail.
There is a very good chance that Almora will never even make it to the majors, but somehow that wouldn't be wasting a pick? Hell if they had picked Appel last year and he didn't sign they would get the pick back again this year. Think if Almora busts out, MLB will give them a pick back?
For somehow whining about others understand how the draft works, you don't seem to have a clue about it at all.
The entire MLB draft is a risk and high school position players at right at the top of the highest risk.
That is usually the case in general when it comes to the MLB draft. Even when you do draft someone, it is often 2-5 years before that player even plays in the majors depending on his age.
So why go after a guy that will take all your draft pool and still possibly not sign? Yes, you get a pick the following year but that's just another year you have to wait to get that player in the majors.
Yes, you get a pick the following year but that's just another year you have to wait to get that player in the majors.
But somehow there is no risk in drafting a high school kid??
There was a lot of talk about Almora not signing and going to college, but the Slurpers conveniently seem to forget that little detail.
There is a very good chance that Almora will never even make it to the majors, but somehow that wouldn't be wasting a pick? Hell if they had picked Appel last year and he didn't sign they would get the pick back again this year. Think if Almora busts out, MLB will give them a pick back?
For somehow whining about others understand how the draft works, you don't seem to have a clue about it at all.
The entire MLB draft is a risk and high school position players at right at the top of the highest risk.
There was no way Almora wanted to go to Miami. Its called trying to get the upper hand in negotiations. His agent told him to say he might go to college to make the Cubs offer him a little more in the contract.
As far as risk, I was saying there was a high rish in drafting Appel because there was very little chance of signing him. The cubs knew they would sign Almora so that was the best option.
No saying theres a "very good chance" that he wont make it is unfair. You are basing this statement of absolutely no truth. If the kid was 3 years into the minors and wasnt hitting, then yea maybe you can say that. For example, Josh Vitters. But to say theres a very good chance he wont make it, its just stupid.
I have a very good idea of how the draft works and thats why the Cubs didnt draft Appel. Why are you failing to release this simple fact
And no 62.9 is not a "very good chance"
So how are you saying Almora cant be an all star? Are you a scout? hmmm nope. The kid 19 years old, you cant judge him yet.
Try actually understanding what you are whining about instead of just making things up.
Dont know why im wasting my time responding but..
Yes, because folding up the OP like it was an origami suddenly makes yours truly a multi talented person who could type with his prostate?
Like really? The evil lapse of one "taking it back to the chatroom" with a myriad of immature insults sure out weighs an honest opinion. I get that. I have read your post and quite honestly, found out that I surely wasn't in need of "trying too hard", and instead, offered a rebuttle to a post without even a shred of logical thought, and was trying to pin point how only a certain amount of teams, in a twenty year window, no less, seemed to always win while the beloved Cubs seem to just keep sucking the life out of their dedicated fanbase. Not even thinking, mind you, that the Cubs, right now, are in the process to actually fix what was wrong for what, over a century? And get past this hirrid history of being the proverbial laughing stock in all of baseball. Pointing out, in a gentlemanly, yet firm way, that whatever happened, even last year, has no bearing what so ever on the future.
Now, being a gentleman of leisure, and having the foresight to comprehend that the laws of entropy would even think of allowing your two distant remaining brain cells to crash together inside that low energy Nadron Collider you call an empty skull and produce a moment of creative insight, lets just try and keep the little childish remarks to the kids, mkay? They are dated, like the last time the Cubs actually played in the WS and almost as relevant as a championship run this year.
There is a bright side to what is going on. I suggest everybody get their Axl Rose on and get a little patience.
Creme
said to be the most polished high school bat in the draft