Thomas Brown for Head Coach

[knoxville7]

LOL @ Dipshitdrew pointing out almost ints!!!!

what can he say?! he subscribes to morons of the midway, apparently

 

[remydat]

They said the same thing on the score, that he is playing for the stat sheet and not the win. Eating sacks rather then letting it rip.

Think it is more he wants to throw beyond the 1st down marker when sometimes it is best to just throw it short and trust your guys to go make a play.

 

[dbldrew]

Think it is more he wants to throw beyond the 1st down marker when sometimes it is best to just throw it short and trust your guys to go make a play.

They where just talking in general not that specific play.

 

[remydat]

They where just talking in general not that specific play.

Yeah I am speaking generally as well particularly his penchant for sacks on 3rd down.

 

[Montucky]

They said the same thing on the score, that he is playing for the stat sheet and not the win. Eating sacks rather then letting it rip.

Who said this? Whenever I turn on WSCR they are just adulating him over DA SPESHUL.

 

[dbldrew]

LOL @ Dipshitdrew pointing out almost ints!!!!

Well I made the simple statement that "thank God DB can't catch" when Remy was sucking off the Brown offence for not having any INT..

And of course Remy demands proof when I said I remember at least 4 in the lions game alone.. so I posted pics .

 

[dbldrew]

Who said this? Whenever I turn on WSCR they are just adulating him over DA SPESHUL.

Might of been ESPN 1000 I bounce back and forth

 

[Les Grossman]

Still can’t believe @remydat started this thread before Brown even Head Coached his first game LMFAO

 

[Les Grossman]

Well I made the simple statement that "thank God DB can't catch" when Remy was sucking off the Brown offence for not having any INT..

And of course Remy demands proof when I said I remember at least 4 in the lions game alone.. so I posted pics .

If they could catch, they’d be WRs sooooo…

 

[dbldrew]

If they could catch, they’d be WRs sooooo…

Of course, which is why I said thank God DB can't catch.

But I want an OC to help develop a QB to NOT throw the ball to the wrong team. Relying on luck that the DB will continue to drop easy INT is not sustainable. Eventually they will stop dropping them.

 

[remydat]

Well I made the simple statement that "thank God DB can't catch" when Remy was sucking off the Brown offence for not having any INT..

And of course Remy demands proof when I said I remember at least 4 in the lions game alone.. so I posted pics .

You posted pics of contested plays and pretending they were almost Ints even when the DB was actually in no position to intercept the ball because a WR was there.

Of course, which is why I said thank God DB can't catch.

But I want an OC to help develop a QB to NOT throw the ball to the wrong team. Relying on luck that the DB will continue to drop easy INT is not sustainable. Eventually they will stop dropping them.

You didn't post pics of easy interceptions. You posted pics of contested plays.

 

[knoxville7]

and remy wonders why folks like me just dont bother to provide him with examples when he asks. he will never acknowledge a thing from anyone

 

[remydat]

View attachment 42366

View attachment 42367
View attachment 42368
View attachment 42369

View attachment 42370
View attachment 42371
View attachment 42372

1st Pic - DJ Moore is right there and actually ended up getting 2 hands on the ball so 0% chance it is intercepted.

2nd Pic - You can literally see Moore with both hands poised to knock the ball away so again 0% chance it actually gets intercepted.

3rd Pic - The ball is literally over everyone's head and the DB has one hand up. Even if we pretend he can one hand catch this, virtually no chance given Allen is contesting this as well.

4th Pic - The Bears WR is literally in position to catch and all the defender can do is knock it away. Again 0% chance he can actually intercept this.

5th Pic - The Lions DB is in full extension and can't actually catch the ball as it is too high. All he can do is knock it away so again not an almost int.

6th Pic - The WR is right there and actually knocks the ball away so again no idea how you are claiming this is an almost Int.

7th - This is actually the only pass where there is no Bears players and is likely the one play that PFF correctly said was a TWP.

Your logic is so dumb that if we applied it to WRs, it would count as a drop/almost catche if a WR only got one hand on the ball or had the ball knocked away by the defender.

 

[remydat]

and remy wonders why folks like me just dont bother to provide him with examples when he asks. he will never acknowledge a thing from anyone

I went through his examples in detail. They aren't almost Ints except for one of them which I acknowledged. If you disagree then explain how. Am I suppose to just accept what he posts when it is obvious he is lying or mistaken?

An almost int like a drop is a situation where the WR or DB had a very good chance of catching the ball. If another player clearly knocks the ball out or actually gets his hands on it then it isn't an almost int or a drop. This is obvious to anyone being honest.

 

[Montucky]

Throwing interceptions and forcing plays is part of the growth process. Honestly, it’s kind of part of playing the position. The really good quarterbacks in the league all throw a pick or two from time to time. There’s a reason he took this record from Kyler Murray of all people.

 

[dbldrew]

I went through his examples in detail. They aren't almost Ints except for one of them which I acknowledged. If you disagree then explain how. Am I suppose to just accept what he posts when it is obvious he is lying or mistaken?

An almost int like a drop is a situation where the WR or DB had a very good chabce of catching the ball. If another player clearly knocks the ball out or actually gets his hands on it then it isn't an almost int or a drop. This is obvious to anyone being honest.

yes you went through them in detail and gave your OPINION on the plays.. an opinion that literally nobody here cares about at all. You are incapable of being objective once you have dug yourself in on a stance or point. No matter what evidence is presented you will vortex it away create strawman arguments, lie change to subject etc. Everyone understands this so nobody cares for your opinion on anything, its meaningless and why most people dont care to even engage with you.

I dont care if you accept it or not, I said..

"The reality is the CW/ Brown offense puts the ball into the other teams hands, thats the reality. If you are happy with pure dumb luck that your stat sheet is still clean then OK." @bamainatlanta asked for examples. I gave them. Your opinion on them is completely meaningless to me

 

[remydat]

yes you went through them in detail and gave your OPINION on the plays.. an opinion that literally nobody here cares about at all. You are incapable of being objective once you have dug yourself in on a stance or point. No matter what evidence is presented you will vortex it away create strawman arguments, lie change to subject etc. Everyone understands this so nobody cares for your opinion on anything, its meaningless and why most people dont care to even engage with you.

I dont care if you accept it or not I said..

"The reality is the CW/ Brown offense puts the ball into the other teams hands, thats the reality. If you are happy with pure dumb luck that your stat sheet is still clean then OK." @bamainatlanta asked for examples. I gave them. Your opinion on them is completely meaningless to me

Except you responded to my post about 7 TDs and 0 ints not the other way around. And I also asked you for evidence which is why your post 472 with the examples quotes me not @bamainatlanta

So your entire response here is stupid. You responded to me with talk of almost interceptions and then you quoted me and provided pics. So you clearly cared about my opinion because you have been responding to me this whole time.

Further nothing you said above disputes what I said. All but one of those pics the Bears player knocks the ball away or it is not actually a catchable ball. That isn't an almost Int. We know it isn't because instead of addressing my argument you tried to use an ad hominem fallacy which isn't a relevant argument.

Your ad hominem is also stupid because people clown and make fun of you as well and in fact even more than me so if that was a judge of the strength of an argument your posts are meaningless. You are one of the main targets of ridicule on here sir so pot meet kettle.

So instead of the weak ad hominem, trying addressing the issues. It is not an almost interception if the WR knocked the ball away because then it by definition means the ball was not catchable. What is even more absurd is you claiming those pics show easy interceptions dropped which is horseshit. Only one of them does which again tracks with what PFF said. He had one TWP. Only an idiot would post a WR knocking the ball away and claim it was almost intercepted oe that the DB dropped an easy Int.

 

[remydat]

Let's make this simple. This is your 4th Pic. How the hell can you claim this is an almost Int or easy interception dropped? Like Jesus dude just be honest and admit this example is bullshit.

 

[dbldrew]

Except you responded to my post about 7 TDs and 0 ints not the other way around. And I also asked you for evidence which is why your post 472 with the examples quotes me not @bamainatlanta

So your entire response here is stupid. You responded to me with talk of almost interceptions and then you quoted me and provided pics. So you clearly cared about my opinion because you have been responding to me this whole time.

Further nothing you said above disputes what I said. All but one of those pics the Bears player knocks the ball away or it is not actually a catchable ball. That isn't an almost Int. We know it isn't because instead of addressing my argument you tried to use an ad hominem fallacy which isn't a relevant argument.

Your ad hominem is also stupid because people clown and make fun of you as well and in fact even more than me so if that was a judge of the strength of an argument your posts are meaningless. You are one of the main targets of ridicule on here sir so pot meet kettle.

So instead of the weak ad hominem, trying addressing the issues. It is not an almost interception if the WR knocked the ball away because then it by definition means the ball was not catchable. What is even more absurd is you claiming those pics show easy interceptions dropped which is horseshit. Only one of them does which again tracks with what PFF said. He had one TWP. Only an idiot would post a WR knocking the ball away and claim it was almost intercepted oe that the DB dropped an easy Int.

yes I said "thank god DBs cant catch" and bama asked for examples once I said there was multiple examples, I replied to him and said if I get time I will look back through the game and post them.. You jumped on board after that demanding examples as well..

Yes I dont care about your opinions when you are in your vortex mode.. they are stupid opinions, your vortex makes you look like a fool. You lied/misrepresented the numbers of your TWP multiple times. you are not worth having an honest debate about anything when you are vortexing. The only reason to reply to your vortex is to make you look stupid.. thats it.

You really should give up on the whole vortex thing..

 

[remydat]

yes I said "thank god DBs cant catch" and bama asked for examples once I said there was multiple examples, I replied to him and said if I get time I will look back through the game and post them.. You jumped on board after that demanding examples as well..

Yes I dont care about your opinions when you are in your vortex mode.. they are stupid opinions, your vortex makes you look like a fool. You lied/misrepresented the numbers of your TWP multiple times. you are not worth having an honest debate about anything when you are vortexing. The only reason to reply to your vortex is to make you look stupid.. thats it.

You really should give up on the whole vortex thing..

Again more ad hominem attacks that don't address how stupid your claims are.



You lied as this is not an almost Int or an easy int dropped. You are now running away from your obvious lie.