Thomas Brown for Head Coach

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,139
Liked Posts:
2,573
Again more ad hominem attacks that don't address how stupid your claims are.

View attachment 42380

You lied as this is not an almost Int or an easy int dropped. You are now running game from your obvious lie.
I understand that math has not been your friend this debate so let's review..

If I get around to it tonight I will look through the lions game, PFF only has it listed as 1 and there is 3 if not 4 in the lions game alone.

3 or 4 and I posted 7 pictures..

Vortex failure again Remy
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,737
Liked Posts:
40,181
I understand that math has not been your friend this debate so let's review..



3 or 4 and I posted 7 pictures..

Vortex failure again Remy

So you intentionally posted pictures you knew were not almost interceptions? Sounds like a liar to me. So to be clear you admit that is not an almost Int? Ok we down to 6.

CWvL2.png

Explain how the DB can catch this ball when the WR is positioned to knock it away?
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
38,622
Liked Posts:
35,940
Location:
Cumming
View attachment 42366

View attachment 42367View attachment 42368
View attachment 42369

View attachment 42370
View attachment 42371
View attachment 42372

So these are the plays I remember from the Lions game, a few of them seemed worse in real time compared to watching in slow motion, like the player with a closed fist, yes the ball went through his hands but he was obviously trying to knock the ball away vs catch it.

But one thing we can now say for a fact is yes the CW/Brown offence likes to put the ball in the other teams hands, and also PFF is a joke only having 1 TWP in this clusterfuck of a game.

edit @bamainatlanta you wanted examples, here they are
lol. Nice try. Maybe 3 of those and that’s a stretch. You’re so bad at this. Maybe we need to go back to explaining to you what a sack is or how to compute averages. Baby steps.
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
38,622
Liked Posts:
35,940
Location:
Cumming
Well I made the simple statement that "thank God DB can't catch" when Remy was sucking off the Brown offence for not having any INT..

And of course Remy demands proof when I said I remember at least 4 in the lions game alone.. so I posted pics .
You posted pics that failed spectacularly as always.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,737
Liked Posts:
40,181
You posted pics that failed spectacularly as always.
By his logic any pass a DB kncoked down that a WR would hace caught is an almost catch/completion.

Dude is literally trying to claim as easy interceptions balls the WR knocked away.
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
38,622
Liked Posts:
35,940
Location:
Cumming
Here’s FTN’s stats on Caleb(most of them ain’t pretty) but his interception worthy plays is much lower than what dipshit posted 8 interception worthy throws on the year. This doesn’t excuse taking bad sacks, throwing more inaccurate than Trubisky and looking for the home run ball waaaay too often.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2394.png
    IMG_2394.png
    338.3 KB · Views: 3

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,737
Liked Posts:
40,181
Here’s FTN’s stats on Caleb(most of them ain’t pretty) but his interception worthy plays is much lower than what dipshit posted 8 interception worthy throws on the year. This doesn’t excuse taking bad sacks, throwing more inaccurate than Trubisky and looking for the home run ball waaaay too often.

He is going to tell you they are lying too. Vast conspiracy by PFF and FTN to prop uo Caleb and only Caleb.
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
38,622
Liked Posts:
35,940
Location:
Cumming
By his logic any pass a DB kncoked down that a WR would hace caught is an almost catch/completion.

Dude is literally trying to claim as easy interceptions balls the WR knocked away.
PFF tracks interception throw % which includes INT’s and dropped INT’s. Cutler used to always be near the top of the league. Caleb, even with all his faults, is above average(but one could make the case that his inaccurate throws make it so no one can intercept). PFR also has him above average in that department as well. Maybe someone with NextGen can see where he ranks.
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
38,622
Liked Posts:
35,940
Location:
Cumming
He is going to tell you they are lying too. Vast conspiracy by PFF and FTN to prop uo Caleb and only Caleb.
Yep. Same FTN that drags Caleb over the coals in EPA, Expected completion % and in other categories.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,139
Liked Posts:
2,573
So you intentionally posted pictures you knew were not almost interceptions? Sounds like a liar to me. So to be clear you admit that is not an almost Int? Ok we down to 6.

View attachment 42381

Explain how the DB can catch this ball when the WR is positioned to knock it away?

Yes I posted the ones I remembered being close calls and you could only accuse me of being a liar if you ignore this..

"So these are the plays I remember from the Lions game, a few of them seemed worse in real time compared to watching in slow motion"

Another vortex failure
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,139
Liked Posts:
2,573
PFF tracks interception throw % which includes INT’s and dropped INT’s. Cutler used to always be near the top of the league. Caleb, even with all his faults, is above average(but one could make the case that his inaccurate throws make it so no one can intercept). PFR also has him above average in that department as well. Maybe someone with NextGen can see where he ranks.
You honestly believe the lions game only had 1 turnover worthy play? Really?
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,139
Liked Posts:
2,573
lol. Nice try. Maybe 3 of those and that’s a stretch. You’re so bad at this. Maybe we need to go back to explaining to you what a sack is or how to compute averages. Baby steps.
I quoted you saying there was 3 maybe 4 in the lions game.. so I guess you agreed with me that all the close calls I posted there was 3 like I originally said.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,737
Liked Posts:
40,181
Yes I posted the ones I remembered being close calls and you could only accuse me of being a liar if you ignore this..

"So these are the plays I remember from the Lions game, a few of them seemed worse in real time compared to watching in slow motion"

Another vortex failure
But it wasnt a close call at all so there was no point posting except to inflate things ie to deceive.


Of course, which is why I said thank God DB can't catch.

But I want an OC to help develop a QB to NOT throw the ball to the wrong team. Relying on luck that the DB will continue to drop easy INT is not sustainable. Eventually they will stop dropping them.
So stop being lazy. Which of those actual photos are you claiming are easy interceptions. Post the exact pic and explain why the DB was going to make the easy Int even as the WR knocks the ball away?
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
38,622
Liked Posts:
35,940
Location:
Cumming
You honestly believe the lions game only had 1 turnover worthy play? Really?
I’ll go with FTN who charts this. They only have 8 on the year and ESPN/yahoo/vegas/DK/FD all pay them to help with their algorithms. Are they perfect? lol no. But I’ll take them over whatever bs this board spews.
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
19,548
Liked Posts:
4,764
I went through his examples in detail. They aren't almost Ints except for one of them which I acknowledged. If you disagree then explain how. Am I suppose to just accept what he posts when it is obvious he is lying or mistaken?

An almost int like a drop is a situation where the WR or DB had a very good chance of catching the ball. If another player clearly knocks the ball out or actually gets his hands on it then it isn't an almost int or a drop. This is obvious to anyone being honest.
Yuu don't get to decide the definition of "almost interception" dumbass. A good portion of those you claim are not almost interceptions because the WR is forced to play DB and knock the ball away from the CB.........That is the very definition of almost INT.

Yisus Christ are you stupid.

An almost INT is where the Defender has a greater than 50% chance of catching the ball.

You lose again.

Also, another spectacular failing hot take of a thread by you.
 

Les Grossman

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 22, 2011
Posts:
15,014
Liked Posts:
13,732
Yuu don't get to decide the definition of "almost interception" dumbass. A good portion of those you claim are not almost interceptions because the WR is forced to play DB and knock the ball away from the CB.........That is the very definition of almost INT.

Yisus Christ are you stupid.

An almost INT is where the Defender has a greater than 50% chance of catching the ball.

You lose again.

Also, another spectacular failing hot take of a thread by you.
There is no definition of almost INT. It's a stupid f**king idea that idiots use to back up an argument that normally doesn't hold water.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
6,139
Liked Posts:
2,573
I’ll go with FTN who charts this. They only have 8 on the year and ESPN/yahoo/vegas/DK/FD all pay them to help with their algorithms. Are they perfect? lol no. But I’ll take them over whatever bs this board spews.
Didn't you just say there was 3? So I guess you will take what a website said over your own eyes? Ok cool.
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
19,548
Liked Posts:
4,764
There is no definition of almost INT. It's a stupid f**king idea that idiots use to back up an argument that normally doesn't hold water.

I agree, but common sense says that anytime a DB has a greater chance of catching the ball than the WR, that's not a good thing.
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
38,622
Liked Posts:
35,940
Location:
Cumming
I agree, but common sense says that anytime a DB has a greater chance of catching the ball than the WR, that's not a good thing.
It’s called the Cutler Special
 

Top