Tom Ricketts Wants Your Help......Again.

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
I see it at most making ~4 games difference over the course of the year, whether that be for or against the Cubs. I think that the better team is really all that matters. However, I don't think it hurts the Cubs that they play the day games.

And what are you using to come up with 4 games?
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
And what are you using to come up with 4 games?

He's using the new saber stat called DaTMYSACK

Day
Time
Month
Year
Superfluous
Advantage
Calculation
Knowledgebase

Calculated: (((Day if Month * 2)+(Time of Day-1))*((Number of Month * 3)+(Year of Decade)))/(Times sucked Hendry's dick)-(Number years since last world championship)
 

TheCubfather

Holy Cow!
Joined:
Jun 10, 2011
Posts:
241
Liked Posts:
38
Location:
1060 W. Addison
with rahm as the mayor and a cubs fan, the renovations will be made soon most likely.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
He's using the new saber stat called DaTMYSACK

Day
Time
Month
Year
Superfluous
Advantage
Calculation
Knowledgebase

Calculated: (((Day if Month * 2)+(Time of Day-1))*((Number of Month * 3)+(Year of Decade)))/(Times sucked Hendry's dick)-(Number years since last world championship)

ROFL! thats awesome!
 

2SeamHeat

I Know Nuffing!!!!!
Joined:
Aug 15, 2011
Posts:
897
Liked Posts:
188
Location:
West Texas
Look at the teams we have put onto the field. Does it really matter? No. The teams we put out there weren't going to win anyways. As I have already stated, it ultimately comes down to the product you put onto the field day in and day out.

Advantage: oh we have the only store in the hood... harmful effect of advantage: but we get robbed 4 times a week.

Advantage: we hire illegal aliens to work for us at $2/HR... harmful effect: the INS caught up with us and now we are facing 5 times our annual revenue in fines... as well as prison time.

Advantage: we shipped all of our assembly operations overseas to avoid high priced unions and American workers' salaries... harmful effect: not enough Americans can afford to buy our crappy cars.

Advantage: we play 60 games a year during the day to screw with our opponents' biological clocks... harmful effect: our own players' biological clocks are messed up even more... and we make about 2/3 the revenue during the day that we can at night.

I don't think you can call something an advantage when it harms your revenue potential... which means your payroll potential... which means your talent potential. It's simple fact, when you play at night you expand viewership of the games on TV. This means higher advertising revenue, which results in larger payouts during broadcast negotiations. You play at night, you make more money. The more money you make, the more you can spend on payroll, coaching, scouting, and development.

This notion of playing games during the day because other team's aren't used to playing at that time works both ways. If the Cubs have this advantage, then every other team has an advantage over the Cubs when they play at night... for the same EXACT reasoning. Also, it hurts the team even more. You come home from a 6-game road trip, play the next day at home during the day... while the other teams NOT playing in Wrigley don't exhaust themselves that little extra bit by playing hours later. It's not a new phenomenon that the Cubs fade in September.... even when putting together good teams. The 2007-08 season you love to point out as being huge successes... those guys looked awfully damned worn out by the last two weeks of the season... and had NO energy in the playoffs.
 
Last edited:

Sunbiz1

New member
Joined:
May 6, 2010
Posts:
6,543
Liked Posts:
1,721
Serious question for people who actually know something about engineering and architecture...

How long do you think Wrigley Field can last without major renovations? Even after renovations, how long can they continue to patch it together?

At some point they have to think about starting from scratch.

The upper decks have been repeatedly reinforced, patching is an option for perhaps another decade...maybe 2. They obviously have to conduct regular structural inspections. The upper decks will have to be completely re-built. That's a big job b/c the roof and walls tie into them. The original architectural rendering had the larger triangle design, replacing all outer walls barring OF Ivy and a few other of the historical portions.

Which is good way to go IMHO.
 

derosabomb

Joecawks is a dope
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
9,066
Liked Posts:
3,630
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
So the cubs want to use money out of the amusement tax? lol wtf is your peoples problem. the cubs are what the 3rd biggest tourist attraction in the fucking state. why cant they use money that they generate for themselves?
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
So the cubs want to use money out of the amusement tax? lol wtf is your peoples problem. the cubs are what the 3rd biggest tourist attraction in the fucking state. why cant they use money that they generate for themselves?
If the state and city are bankrupt, how do they pay for the Cubs :shrug: :tiptoe:
 

CODE_BLUE56

Ded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
19,725
Liked Posts:
4,699
Location:
Texas
Advantage: oh we have the only store in the hood... harmful effect of advantage: but we get robbed 4 times a week.

Advantage: we hire illegal aliens to work for us at $2/HR... harmful effect: the INS caught up with us and now we are facing 5 times our annual revenue in fines... as well as prison time.

Advantage: we shipped all of our assembly operations overseas to avoid high priced unions and American workers' salaries... harmful effect: not enough Americans can afford to buy our crappy cars.

Advantage: we play 60 games a year during the day to screw with our opponents' biological clocks... harmful effect: our own players' biological clocks are messed up even more... and we make about 2/3 the revenue during the day that we can at night.

I don't think you can call something an advantage when it harms your revenue potential... which means your payroll potential... which means your talent potential. It's simple fact, when you play at night you expand viewership of the games on TV. This means higher advertising revenue, which results in larger payouts during broadcast negotiations. You play at night, you make more money. The more money you make, the more you can spend on payroll, coaching, scouting, and development.

This notion of playing games during the day because other team's aren't used to playing at that time works both ways. If the Cubs have this advantage, then every other team has an advantage over the Cubs when they play at night... for the same EXACT reasoning. Also, it hurts the team even more. You come home from a 6-game road trip, play the next day at home during the day... while the other teams NOT playing in Wrigley don't exhaust themselves that little extra bit by playing hours later. It's not a new phenomenon that the Cubs fade in September.... even when putting together good teams. The 2007-08 season you love to point out as being huge successes... those guys looked awfully damned worn out by the last two weeks of the season... and had NO energy in the playoffs.

:clap:

post of the thread
 

derosabomb

Joecawks is a dope
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
9,066
Liked Posts:
3,630
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
If the state and city are bankrupt, how do they pay for the Cubs :shrug: :tiptoe:

if the cubs generate the tax why cant they use it.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
if the cubs generate the tax why cant they use it.

because the money still doesn't exist because the city/state need it to pay back debts... :shrug:





Bandits 3 outs away from NPF championship :shifty:
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
you dont even live in illinois stfu
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgmwisY5fkw]2Pac - I Ain't Mad At Cha (Official Music Video) *HD* - YouTube[/ame]

I ain't mad at cha Dero.

Doesn't I can't watch WGN news at 9 :D:tiptoe:
 

CODE_BLUE56

Ded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
19,725
Liked Posts:
4,699
Location:
Texas
Gov and business isn't the same.

nor do all business or government courses teach you what you need to know or teach you the right stuff...


gov and business are definitely related..but of course they are definitely not the same lol
 

Captain Obvious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jul 31, 2010
Posts:
4,967
Liked Posts:
697
you could make the same case with the cubs not being used to night games

I disagree. It's not hard to get up at 2 PM to be at the ballpark at 4 PM. It's hard to get up at like 8 to at the park by 10, though. Especially if you're coming off of a night game.
 

Top