- Joined:
- May 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,947
- Liked Posts:
- 3,118
You are what your record says you are:
2013 Cubs 48-58
2012 Cubs through 106 games-43-63
2013 Cubs 48-58
2012 Cubs through 106 games-43-63
I was well out of high school when McPhail was introduced as the savior. There are glaring similarities between what was promised then and what is now. I don't believe for a minute just because the Cubs have thrown more expansive computer software and people at the project that it's going to turn out any different.
It doesn't take alot of people to do what Epstein is trying to do. It takes ONE SMART ONE. Unfortunately we didn't get Billy Beane or Freidman.
You are what your record says you are:
2013 Cubs 48-58
2012 Cubs through 106 games-43-63
Both shitty bottom feeders.
That is what those records say.
You are what your record says you are:
2013 Cubs 48-58
2012 Cubs through 106 games-43-63
We are about to be swept by the Brewers. Lets not state records yet. I got a feeling its about to go south quickly. Without Soriano in the lineup, the lineup looks absolutely horrible. Don't get me wrong it was really bad with Soriano, but now I basically just assume we are scoring 3 or less runs.
every time theres a mistakes , i Troll on here jumping up and down and throwing sippy cups everywhere about it.
I just want to be clear what counts here or not. I was told repeatedly that the only thing that matters is wins at the major league level. It would seem by that measure this team is currently better.
And for the point about future performance it is certainly possible that this goes south, but we did just come off sweeping the Giants without Soriano in the lineup. And well I have a little faith in this club being able to outperform a team last year that had Justin Germano, Jason Berken, and other dreck taking the ball 3 out of 5 to 4 out of 5 starts down the stretch.
Glad you finally came out and admitted to what you do on here every day on every thread...
I just want to be clear what counts here or not. I was told repeatedly that the only thing that matters is wins at the major league level. It would seem by that measure this team is currently better.
And for the point about future performance it is certainly possible that this goes south, but we did just come off sweeping the Giants without Soriano in the lineup. And well I have a little faith in this club being able to outperform a team last year that had Justin Germano, Jason Berken, and other dreck taking the ball 3 out of 5 to 4 out of 5 starts down the stretch.
If you havent read for the 1000th time why were bitching, I'm not going to explain it again. There's no point. I can dumb it down where it gets no bigger than 3-letter words, and you idiots will still misinterpret it. The funny thing is that we agree with about 80 percent of what you do......maybe more
[Based on your post i guess you're bitching that the cubs are trading current "talent" to play for the future rather than the present. If that's the case you seem pretty naive to how terrible the cubs are. They aren't 1 player away. They aren't 5 players away. They probably aren't even 10 players away./QUOTE]
Future talent can always be had while feilding a contending team. That's how naive most Cubs fans are that have bought into the PR bullshit campaign.
We are now further away then two years ago at competing. Nothing has been added to improve the team. I don't care about the potential "extra money" available. They are showing no intentions of spending it any time soon. So all this regime has done for the ML team is Turd Wood, Rizzo, and Edwin Jackson in two fucking years. The rest is garbage. But I guess we are supposed to beileve it's for a higher cause while the team sinks deeper down the shitter in hopes of an occasional flash of lightning from Des Moines.
What a complete waste of time.
I love how major league wins only matter to you when they back up your point.
I just want to be clear what counts here or not. I was told repeatedly that the only thing that matters is wins at the major league level. It would seem by that measure this team is currently better.
Ian Stewart- worst mistake to date.
Chris Volstad- served his purpose in ridding us of Z just didn't workout, not a mistake, just not a success.
Scott Baker- cheap hardly worth the discussion.
Scott Hairston- barely played, traded for a spec sounds like a success to me.
Luis Valbuena (I really am missing all that great talk about how he is out producing Eric Chavez)
Kyuji Fujikawa- still wondering on this one.
Justin Germano- filled a hole, wasn't meant to matter.
Have you even been paying attention??
Minus Garza, Soriano and whomever else might get dealt in the next month, the team is worse than it was at this point last year and the Cubs finished the season 18-36. That is entirely possible again which would leave the Cubs at 66-96.
Yet you will be the first to talk about what great progress that is.
Glad you finally came out and admitted to what you do on here every day on every thread...
most of your mistakes don't cost the team almost 300 million dollars and were never meant to be more then trade bait. Troll on.
Please cite.
Originally Posted by KBisBack!
No you clearly don't.
I have asked that players be brought in for 4-5 year deals that will help the ball club improve for more than 1/2 a season before they are traded off for a lottery ticket.
You clearly think that taking one step forward and three steps back is moving in the right direction.
You can't be helped.
Like who?
Wasn't Edwin Jackson brought in on a 4 year deal? Why do you hate him?