Updates to the Kane situation

Is #88 a Dumpster Fire?


  • Total voters
    19
Status
Not open for further replies.

HeHateMe

He/Himz/Hiz
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
59,687
Liked Posts:
52,658
Yeah because assuming Kane was innocent from the get go (with absolutely no facts) is such a noble thing to do.

Congrats on probably "being right", because we all know that no woman has ever been raped and it's always a money grab.

Idiots like you are why more women don't come forward when they've been sexually assaulted. Hope you're proud of yourself. Don't sever your spinal cord even you bend down to give yourself a ********.

giphy.gif
 

DMelt36

Bolland > You
Joined:
May 27, 2010
Posts:
13,969
Liked Posts:
8,434
The DA also suggested that some of the leaks to the media that have been reported are untrue. So keep that in mind. I don't think I'm gonna believe anyone's "sources" for the rest of this case. I wanna hear it from the DA or someone's lawyer first-hand or I'm not gonna believe it.
 

Samurai

Ridiculum Anserini
Joined:
Dec 6, 2014
Posts:
1,865
Liked Posts:
872
Location:
Out Back Chopping Trees
I wanna hear it from the DA or someone's lawyer first-hand or I'm not gonna believe it.
Yeah, the accusers lawyer was spot on. :elephant:


Sorry...I couldn't resist. That said, I loved the DA. He was/is the only completely truthful entity in this whole shitstorm.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
No, you just said that 92-98% of the time, the allegations are true (based on your shoddy, propaganda stats from RAINN). We know where you stood.

Because I said there is an 8% chance she was lying it means I'm on her side? Because the odds weren't really in Kane's favor, that implies I thought he was a rapist? Though I didn't even fucking give an opinion whatsoever. I stated absolute facts that are accessible to everyone.

You're the one who has implied and said most of the asinine bullshit in this thread, hence why so many people have gone after your posts.





Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

BlackHawkPaul

Fartbarf
Donator
Joined:
Sep 28, 2010
Posts:
5,997
Liked Posts:
2,338
Location:
Somewhere in Indiana
Because I said there is an 8% chance she was lying it means I'm on her side? Because the odds weren't really in Kane's favor, that implies I thought he was a rapist? Though I didn't even fucking give an opinion whatsoever. I stated absolute facts that are accessible to everyone.

You're the one who has implied and said most of the asinine bullshit in this thread, hence why so many people have gone after your posts.





Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

I'd also like to see where so many reporters were "going after Kane."
Are the lines blurred between reporting and accusation, or are the fans blurring that line for their own personal agendas?
 

italianbeef

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2015
Posts:
822
Liked Posts:
167
So the last 48-72 hours were basically much ado about nothing. Now we're back to the case, where we still don't know a fucking thing about what actually happened. I've got little reason to believe what I've heard from just about anyone's "sources." It's still a wait-and-see situation.

Uh, no. The DA confirmed two things today. 1) He did release DNA results to both sides, so you can trust the leaks that exonerate Kane, and 2) If the complainant knew of her mom's actions or was involved, it's over.

To pretend like nothing that happened over the last 48 hours matters is quite delusional.

68b025a73344970e9703c6af3da978b7.gif
 

DMelt36

Bolland > You
Joined:
May 27, 2010
Posts:
13,969
Liked Posts:
8,434
Uh, no. The DA confirmed two things today. 1) He did release DNA results to both sides, so you can trust the leaks that exonerate Kane, and 2) If the complainant knew of her mom's actions or was involved, it's over.

To pretend like nothing that happened over the last 48 hours matters is quite delusional.

I can trust the supports that your stance, eh?

And I'm the delusional one? **** outta here.
 

Samurai

Ridiculum Anserini
Joined:
Dec 6, 2014
Posts:
1,865
Liked Posts:
872
Location:
Out Back Chopping Trees
I'd also like to see where so many reporters were "going after Kane."
Are the lines blurred between reporting and accusation, or are the fans blurring that line for their own personal agendas?
It's increasingly hard to discern the differences between actual reporters, and random vox populi. One problem I've had with some actual reporters, is their assertion that PK should not be allowed in training camp. To me that infers a bias of presumed guilt. That's their way of skirting the issue without actually proclaiming him guilty. I'm sure many have also proclaimed him innocent without actually using those words.

Like I said before, the only person I trust to convey the truth is the DA. Until this is over, the witch hunters should be rendered mute. The witch hunter hunters...I haven't yet decided.
 

italianbeef

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2015
Posts:
822
Liked Posts:
167
Yeah, the mother was way out of line with that. The DA didn't seem convinced that any legal ramifications could affect her, but maaaaaaaaan did she make that lawyer look terrible.
.

Yeah, the soccer mom sure duped that wiley lawyer, with 30 years experience, who didn't know that rape kits don't go in bags.

How gullible are you people?
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
39,472
Liked Posts:
36,760
Location:
Cumming
Uh, no. The DA confirmed two things today. 1) He did release DNA results to both sides, so you can trust the leaks that exonerate Kane, and 2) If the complainant knew of her mom's actions or was involved, it's over.

To pretend like nothing that happened over the last 48 hours matters is quite delusional.

68b025a73344970e9703c6af3da978b7.gif

"much ado about nothing", lawyer removes himself from case, so-called tampered evidence is discredited, the victim's friend backs off from testifying....maybe it's because that award winning Tim Graham didn't report it. This case is far from over but it's not looking good for all parties involved at this point.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
I'd also like to see where so many reporters were "going after Kane."
Are the lines blurred between reporting and accusation, or are the fans blurring that line for their own personal agendas?

I'm with DMelt on this, until the DA says anything else, I'm not going to discuss it. Hell im tired of discussing it here.

Going on with what Paul has said here:

Because saying that our society has a problem with sexual assault and rape suddenly makes all the folks with blinders freak out or and claim it's all bullshit is the real problem. That people can't understand that there are females out there who are scared for their life to come forward as they are afraid to face the same doubt, slut shaming, ignorant comments and slander that this woman has, though it probably won't be on the national side, but more close to home. Say Kane did rape this woman (hypothetically), after all the shit that has been said about her on social media and the Internet, what female would ever want to come out and endure that? Hell, most of those comments were made at the very beginning of the accusations, before we had any other facts or saw any false facts come up. You were claiming a woman lied about it, being a gold digger, wanting a pay day, because she "knew" what was going to happen at Kane's house.

That's the biggest issue here, and that's where most of you retards are fucking failing our society by jumping in, BEFORE any facts. Sorry some of us actually see the problem.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

BlackHawkPaul

Fartbarf
Donator
Joined:
Sep 28, 2010
Posts:
5,997
Liked Posts:
2,338
Location:
Somewhere in Indiana
It's increasingly hard to discern the differences between actual reporters, and random vox populi. One problem I've had with some actual reporters, is their assertion that PK should not be allowed in training camp. To me that infers a bias of presumed guilt. That's their way of skirting the issue without actually proclaiming him guilty. I'm sure many have also proclaimed him innocent without actually using those words.

Like I said before, the only person I trust to convey the truth is the DA. Until this is over, the witch hunters should be rendered mute. The witch hunter hunters...I haven't yet decided.
I'm with you.
Again, the interwbz is full of bloggers and such that are cloaked as "reporters."
Which reporters are slandering Kane to the point in which they need a career change?
Where does the reporting stop an editorializing begin? I honestly think there are lines drawn in the sand, but I also think people have gotten to the point where they'll believe any narrative that suits their position.
 

italianbeef

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2015
Posts:
822
Liked Posts:
167
Because I said there is an 8% chance she was lying it means I'm on her side?

JFC you are fucking dense. That 8% means provably, without a shadow of a doubt false - either admission or rock solid alibi that places accused somewhere else. Scores more never result in charges, like this one won't, and according to those stats, unless she admits it, it won't be a false accusation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top