- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
You would use 50 MM to pay for 10 wins because that's the market value. It's pretty simple. You can't treat Cespedes like a draftee because he's not. He's an IFA. You treat him like an IFA. The deal is a success if he is worth the contract. It's as simple as that. When you draft a guy, he's not going to be ready for the MLB, Cespedes(other than a month or so) is ready. Again, we'd be giving him 50 million for his upside. To be worth the contract, he only has to be a decently average CFer and with the trend of declining offense, that only helps his numbers with the bat. It's not a huge stretch of the imagination. Even in the FA market, you basically pay for what you'll get. You're generally lucky if a player is worth it. Cespedes offers something that few FA's can--the ability to completely outperform his contract. Scouts love him and his athleticism and I'm saying he needs to be an average CFer in a relatively easy CF to play.
Can Yoenis Cespedes Showcase Talents In MLB? | FanGraphs Baseball
Since there is a hang up on subjectivity with WAR, I'll post the ZiPS projections, which are objective.
Toronto Blue Jays
ZiPS is the best of the best when it comes to projections, so if we're going to use projections, which I believe qualifies as using all available statistical and metrical data available, these are the ones to use.
You're advocating using the eye ball? Really? Isn't that what we have scouts for? Your eyes aren't a reliable source of information. Period. Also, I was using WAR as a basis for contractual obligation. Last time I checked, you didn't have anything like that. Or am I wrong? All I am saying is that the market value is for a win is 5 million, which is pretty accurate. So unless you have some other way of valuing a win, please kindly **** off.
I don't know how to use it properly. LOL. right. Why don't you make your own argument and stop piggybacking off of everyone else? You can't even stand your own ground, quit being a little *****.
No one is claiming it is a fact. It's conjecture... just highly informed conjecture. Here's an idea... instead of pointing out all the problems, point out the solution.
Bold 1- you are a fucking idiot. "oh about a month or so" How do you know this when he has NEVER seen anything close to the MLB. god you are fucking stupid.
Bod 2- The whole debate on valuing a "win" is NOT fucking real. There are way way too many issues with the formula.