2010-2011 Blackhawk Rumors/Transactions

[E Runs]

He is RFA not UFA. There is no immediate need to resign him right now. They will get something for him either way.

Exactly! Theoretically the Hawks hold all the cards here, they present the contract they're comfortable giving and Seabrook signs or holds out. Unless he has abritration rights, does he?



Hate to sound like Harrold Ballard here but I don't know why teams started giving players all the power in these RFA negoiations. 1st and 2nd time RFAs have cashed in like never before yet some people think the owners took the players to the cleaners during the lockout.

 

[PatrickShart]

I wonder what it would take to get Bogosian out of ATL. From what I understand, he and the staff arent on the same page. If a package of prospects or picks could get him (Lalonde, Beach in there). He hasnt lit it up in ATL but he's pretty big/physical.

 

[Ton]

I wonder what it would take to get Bogosian out of ATL. From what I understand, he and the staff arent on the same page. If a package of prospects or picks could get him (Lalonde, Beach in there). He hasnt lit it up in ATL but he's pretty big/physical.

If he's available, Stan would be smart to see what it would take to snatch him. I highly doubt he's going anywhere though, but there is another d-man from ATL that could help us...

 

[PatrickShart]

....dont say sopel....

 

[R K]

SOPEL!!!

 

[supraman]

Byfuglien!

 

[MassHavoc]

PENIS!!! wait, what were we talking about again?

 

[PatrickShart]

We were talking hockey....obviously, you have something else on your mind.

 

[winos5]

More Boston Rumors

 

[Ton]

YEAH RIGHT! Mark Stuart and Torontos 1st I'm assuming?



Stan isn't that stupid, Stuart would be an upgrade over someone like Boynton, but for Seabrook? Please, don't make me throw up.

 

[winos5]

Best Seabrook Rumor ever.



"CHICAGO TRIBUNE’s Chris Kuc yesterday “tweeted” he’d heard a rumor Brent Seabrook would be dealt to the Blackhawks for himself, claiming that makes as much sense as other rumors he’d heard.



SPECTOR’S NOTE: In other words, Seabrook won’t be dealt, and the Flames aren’t trading away anyone."

 

[Tim]

Heard Stan on the Score an noon today state that trading either Kane or Seabs made no sense. A trade of that nature is a star for a star and he knows what his stars are capable of because they won the Cup.

 

[MassHavoc]

Heard Stan on the Score an noon today state that trading either Kane or Seabs made no sense. A trade of that nature is a star for a star and he knows what his stars are capable of because they won the Cup.

Yeah, that's what I was saying. It would have to be a star for a star, and the reason you trade Seabs is cost, and well if you are getting a star back it's still going to cost you. So what the **** did you trade him for?

 

[winos5]

Stan Bowman

 

[PatrickShart]

TCD

 

[MassHavoc]

TCD

WIN

 

[nana]

TCD

HF50?

 

[MassHavoc]

HF50?

FIFY

 

[puckjim]

Rumors hot and heavy in the Twitterverse that the Hawks are close to acquiring Mark Stuart from the Boston Bruins.

 

[R K]

They have ZERO cap space left. For whom going the other way? For the Hawks to add ANYONE to the Roster one or more ROSTER players will need to be moved.