- Joined:
- Jun 19, 2011
- Posts:
- 32,893
- Liked Posts:
- 25,705
????
Meanwhile...
And finally the lookin over the shoulder, hopin nobody notices, retreat.
Maybe time for a new hobby cause you just bad at trollin.
????
Meanwhile...
The only problem with your Rodgers stats is he has 46 wins, so in 39 of those wins his team is leading going into the 4th quarter and by enough where he doesn't have to have a game winning drive. 85% of his wins are won without worry of losing the lead or having to come back. 7 wins comeback wins/game winning drives doesnt mean he isn't clutch...just shows he puts his team in position to win in the 4th quarter.
Me and FT don't agree on Cutler and Romo but I wouldn't consider either QB clutch. The stats you provided only show the wins how many of their losses were from blown leads? How many time has he been down at half and been able to bring his team back? I don't know the answer to these questions nor do I feel like looking for the answers...but you got to provide better data than that to convince FT or Rory that Cutler is clutch.
They are trolls. You can't convince them otherwise.
Yeah... guy is talking about debating whether Cutler is clutch.... lol... how you think the thread got derailed that far...? lmao
What am I retreating from? I'm one of the few people trying to stay on-topic.
But its nice that you are trying to make Jester feel better after he got his ass handed to him for saying...
While you added this gem to the conversation...
I can't help it if you are borderline Special person and cannot participate in a football discussion. Perhaps this forum isn't the place for you. You might like posting in The Bar or The Chicago Bulls Forum instead?
Great argument. The guy who's team choked away a 3 game lead with 3 games to play is "clutch".
That's sort of like last season when the Cowboys lost their last three games to miss the playoffs.
How did this turn ino another Cutler thread?
I have no idea, but I'll be as happy as a pig in shit when it goes to hell with the rest of the Cutler threads.
Well, I won't be. And my thread has already gone to hell![]()
You should have known better
That's sort of like last season when the Cowboys lost their last three games to miss the playoffs.
I disagree with Theisman. I think Romo is a very good qb. I think he is underrated. I think he gets too much crap just from that one playoff debacle. It's not his fault that he is surrounded by crappy personnel. I fucking hate the Cowboys though.
Romo to me early on was a lot like the Bulls with Rose. He was really good and the Cowboys had enough "talent" to do some damage over the course of a regular season where they didn't see top teams week in and week out and were good enough to put wins together. Come playoff time against top tier teams when talent and matchups tend to even out the Cowboys struggled and were shown to maybe not be as good top to bottom as people had thought. Maybe it's just me but even when they were 13-3 I was always kind of shocked by that record and never really thought they'd get to the Super Bowl.I also think that Romo is hurt by the perception that Dallas is actually adding good players to their offense, when they aren't. Felix Jones was a high draft pick who was suppose to add a speed element to the offense, but he's been a bust. Dez Bryant was supposed to be an annual 1000-yard guy, but he is completely unreliable. Its also interesting how these alleged "talented" guys like Marion Barber and Laurent Robinson go someplace else and they immediately suck. The only guys Romo trusts are Witten and Austin, and they've both been nicked up.