Love is NOT with the Spurs...but if he were...he would be playing more than 29.4 minutes per game. And 16 pts and 14 rebounds per game is a damn good season...he would still be allstar caliber...AND HE WOULD BE HAVING A BETTER SEASON THAN DUNCAN!!! So what is your point?
Again, like I said before, your definition of "better" seems to be off. Playing more minutes and getting more per-game stats does not make you a better player. In some aspects, Love is having a better season than Duncan- yes. But, to me, the one who deserves to make the team is that better player.
Duncan is a better player than Love. No question.
(And to Frank: even by the logic of just going by 'the All-Star game is a popularity contest anyway so who cares' I will say that stereotypically the All-Star game is about the guys who can bring the house down with the best dunks or blocked shots or flashy plays. So, if we bring that into the equation here, Duncan still beats a guy who is only a great player because of his REBOUNDING and spot-up SHOOTING.)
If you think Griffin is a more skilled player than Nowitzki...you should never watch a game of basketball again, and it should be illegal for you to blog. Griffin is not yet top 10 in the damn league! How do you have him above an MVP candidate? My god that's stupid...
Whoa whoa whoa... time out. Being an MVP candidate in and of itself does not make you a better player than somebody who is not in the discussion. You seem to agree with the consensus that Rose is the MVP. Yet, you say and continue to say that LeBron James is the best player in the world.
Speaking of LeBron James... Kobe Bryant is more skilled than he is. Does that mean that Kobe Bryant deserves to be an All-Star more than LeBron James?
Answer:
No.
And you know that :smh:
So when I say that Dirk Nowitzki isn't as good of a player as Blake Griffin, I am saying that DESPITE the fact that he is more skilled than Griffin. Griffin is simply an athletic freak/juggernaut.
You need to stop with these cherry-picked analogies of references. Start taking things on a case-by-case basis.
LeBron James > the more skilled Kobe Bryant
Blake Griffin > the more skilled Dirk Nowitzki
and finally Tim Duncan > the better rebounding, better shooting, and defensive liability Kevin Love
I just think it would be wise of you to just say..."I don't know..." sometimes instead of just coming up with the most benign bullshit passing it off as basketball knowledge. Love is having a great, not good, not decent, a GREAT year. Duncan is decent at best right now, because they are saving him for the playoffs.
Well, I could same the same to you. But the difference is when I say things they seem to actually be true.
And once again... your use of loaded words like "better" are less than sponged with basketball knowledge. And I don't even agree with your interpretation of the word "best/better/sucks" to begin with.
Love is number 2 in rebounding percentage...ahead of Howard, Griffin, Bogut, Noah...and Tim Duncan. So if he was playing with the Spurs...would he have similar rebounding numbers? Who knows? If Duncan was playing with the Lakers, would he play even 30 minutes a game? Maybe, maybe not. This is about here and now...and that is what you don't seem to get.
Let's put it this way:
Team A: The San Antonio Spurs w/ Love in Duncan's place
vs.
Team B: The San Antonio Spurs the way they are set up now
Winner:
This is too obvious to even dignify that with an answer
Now another example:
Team A: The Minnesota Timberwolves w/ Duncan in Love's place
vs.
Team B: The Minnesota Timberwolves the way they are now
Now, I will grant you that this one is a little more tricky. If this was a meaningless exhibition then it is possible that Duncan would rest for about 7-10 minutes longer than Love. But nevertheless, during the times they are both on the floor together, both would nearly pull down the same number of rebounds for the fact that neither guy traditionally gives up many offensive rebounds to whomever they are matched up against. And you also must remember that Duncan is a guy who makes others (say Brewer, Ridnour, and even Milicic) better with his great passing and post-up presence. And his defensive presence is astonomically more beneficial than that of Kevin Love. I will grant you that Duncan would have a hard time playing 25 minutes with the pace of the T-Wolves.
But on the other hand, if this was a playoff game (and not a meaningless exhibition), I am fairly confident that given the need-being that Duncan will be able to play a solid 35 minutes or maybe even more (as he has on 5 other occassions this season for example). And who do I trust more in a must-win game situation? Duncan.