mecha
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 12,914
- Liked Posts:
- 8,836
@vabearsfan15 just give up. you're going to keep getting walked on by a true CCS legend, @Anytime23.
Good lord is @Leomaz just a worthless poster.Here i was IN REAL TIME defending the Bears defense from known troll @Leomaz who claimed he could get 1000 yards on them. Very convenient that OP doesn't remember this one. Too lazy to do the research too!
View attachment 21336
@vabearsfan15 just give up. you're going to keep getting walked on by a true CCS legend, @Anytime23.
I know how burden of proof works. But it's not on me.I don’t care where they are, I’m even sure what they are, I’m just telling you how burden of proof works. Also lots of people have given you examples although again I really don’t know what real time solutions means.
Do you give a lot of those?
Missing on Watson was actually a very realistic criticism thoughI know how burden of proof works. But it's not on me.
"Real time solutions" mean that you are offering, in real actual time, solutions for what the Bears should do. Who should they draft? Who should they hire? Who should they sign I'm free agency? Etc...butvthey key is trying to come uo with a solution before hand when the outcome is not known.
I've been critical of Anytime in the past because he loves to criticize in hindsight. Yet he doesn't consider the context the decision was made. What were the alternative solutions?
for example, no one knew Mahomes was going to be a stud QB. Many were projecting him as a 2nd rd qb leading up to the draft. Most teams in the top 10 had eyes on the next upcoming draft class. So it isn't fair to harshly criticize everyone in the top 10 for missing Mahomes. No one could gave imagined his success in real time. Of course in hindsight it looks so obvious
I did but that’s because I went to Texas tech and worked on football team and watched him play there. He was incredible. He was the best college qb I’ve ever seen. But tech as a whole sucked. If you watched the Oklahoma game his last year you’d have seen his talent.I know how burden of proof works. But it's not on me.
"Real time solutions" mean that you are offering, in real actual time, solutions for what the Bears should do. Who should they draft? Who should they hire? Who should they sign I'm free agency? Etc...butvthey key is trying to come uo with a solution before hand when the outcome is not known.
I've been critical of Anytime in the past because he loves to criticize in hindsight. Yet he doesn't consider the context the decision was made. What were the alternative solutions?
for example, no one knew Mahomes was going to be a stud QB. Many were projecting him as a 2nd rd qb leading up to the draft. Most teams in the top 10 had eyes on the next upcoming draft class. So it isn't fair to harshly criticize everyone in the top 10 for missing Mahomes. No one could gave imagined his success in real time. Of course in hindsight it looks so obvious
The thing is, you actually have a history of persecuting mock drafting, especially my mock drafting, but somehow I've found a way to get past that and not pour gasoline all over myself in real time and ask internet people to throw matches at me.Never in my wildest dreams would i have thought that i could get a poster to meltdown because i have no history of *checks notes* MOCK DRAFTING!
i guess me pounding the table for the Bears to fire Pace isn't a "real time solution" luuulMissing on Watson was actually a very realistic criticism though
I know how burden of proof works. But it's not on me.
"Real time solutions" mean that you are offering, in real actual time, solutions for what the Bears should do. Who should they draft? Who should they hire? Who should they sign I'm free agency? Etc...butvthey key is trying to come uo with a solution before hand when the outcome is not known.
I've been critical of Anytime in the past because he loves to criticize in hindsight. Yet he doesn't consider the context the decision was made. What were the alternative solutions?
for example, no one knew Mahomes was going to be a stud QB. Many were projecting him as a 2nd rd qb leading up to the draft. Most teams in the top 10 had eyes on the next upcoming draft class. So it isn't fair to harshly criticize everyone in the top 10 for missing Mahomes. No one could gave imagined his success in real time. Of course in hindsight it looks so obvious
So you just discount his caping for Roman, Roquan, and Fields, all just in this past season?I know how burden of proof works. But it's not on me.
"Real time solutions" mean that you are offering, in real actual time, solutions for what the Bears should do. Who should they draft? Who should they hire? Who should they sign I'm free agency? Etc...butvthey key is trying to come uo with a solution before hand when the outcome is not known.
I've been critical of Anytime in the past because he loves to criticize in hindsight. Yet he doesn't consider the context the decision was made. What were the alternative solutions?
for example, no one knew Mahomes was going to be a stud QB. Many were projecting him as a 2nd rd qb leading up to the draft. Most teams in the top 10 had eyes on the next upcoming draft class. So it isn't fair to harshly criticize everyone in the top 10 for missing Mahomes. No one could gave imagined his success in real time. Of course in hindsight it looks so obvious
That was negative against Pace. WHO should they have hired ?i guess me pounding the table for the Bears to fire Pace isn't a "real time solution" luuul
Only positive real time solutions.
You are a class act. Its funny because our first CCS interaction was a negative one. No one held a grudge and spent the next 3 years crying about it. Look at us now. Your mocks are still awful(no one cares) and we have voice chats once a week to catch up on life. Very nice table btw.The thing is, you actually have a history of persecuting mock drafting, especially my mock drafting, but somehow I've found a way to get past that and not pour gasoline all over myself in real time and ask internet people to throw matches at me.
Rick Smith was my top choice.That was negative against Pace. WHO should they have hired ?
In real time too!Rick Smith was getting a lot of love (positive) from a good number of posters here.
I remember that now too because we agreed.Rick Smith was my top choice.
In real time too!
for example, no one knew Mahomes was going to be a stud QB. Many were projecting him as a 2nd rd qb leading up to the draft. Most teams in the top 10 had eyes on the next upcoming draft class. So it isn't fair to harshly criticize everyone in the top 10 for missing Mahomes. No one could gave imagined his success in real time. Of course in hindsight it looks so obvious